Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 27;28(3):362–379. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0361

Table 3.

Comparison of diagnostic performance for HCC between CEUS LI-RADS and other diagnostic criteria

Study Study type Contrast agent LI-RADS
“APHE and washout”
On-site diagnosis
Sen (%) Spe (%) Sen (%) Spe (%) Sen (%) Spe (%)
Huang et al. [17],* (2020) Retrospective SonoVue 73.3 97.1 88.6 87.1 N/A N/A
Strobel et al. [19] (2021) Prospective Unmentioned 65.2 78.6 74.3 63.0 91.5 67.4
Schellhaas et al. [20] (2021) Prospective Unmentioned 64.0 78.9 68.6 57.9 90.9 64.9
Zhou et al. [18] (2022) Prospective SonoVue 38.6–63.6 92.7–100.0 88.6–100.0 28.6–64.3 N/A N/A

HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound; LI-RADS, Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; APHE, arterial phase hyperenhancement; Sen, sensitivity; Spe, specificity; N/A, not applicable.

*

All lesions are 20 mm or smaller.

Subjective on-site diagnosis of the examiner.