Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 13;28(3):380–395. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0366

Table 3.

Clinical studies investigating the effects of aspirin use on hepatocellular carcinoma in general population

Study Study design Data source Cirrhosis (%) Total patients* (users/non-users) HCC Dose Definition of aspirin users Follow-up (years) Outcome
Sahasrabuddhe et al. [64] (2012) Prospective cohort study NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort NR 300,504 (219,291/81,213) 250 NR Self-reported 9.2 RR, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.45–0.77)
Yang et al. [68] (2016) Case-control study Clinical Practice Research Datalink Chronic liver disease 3.3% 5,835 (376/1,294) 1,195 NR ≥2 filled prescription 11.0 No protective effect
Simon et al. [93] (2018) Prospective cohort study Nurses’ Health Study, Health Professionals Follow-up Study NR 133,371 (58,855/74,526) 108 325 mg Self-reported (≥2/week) 26 aHR, 0.51 (95% CI, 0.34–0.77)
Hwang et al. [66] (2018) Retrospective cohort study Korean National Health Insurance Corporation Claims Database NR 460,755 (64,782/395,973) 2,336 NR ≥30 cDDDs 6.4 HR, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77–0.98)
Tsoi et al. [67] (2019) Retrospective cohort study Hospital Authority Clinical Data Repository NR 612,509 (204,170/408,339) 9,370 Low dose (median, 80 mg) ≥6 months of prescription 7.7 RR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.45–0.53)
Shen et al. [94] (2020) Case-control study Connecticut and New Jersey Cancer registry and University Hospital 24.80% 1,839 (676/1,163) 673 NR Self-reported NR aOR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.30–0.52)

HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NIH-AARP, the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons; NR, not reported; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; cDDDs, cumulative defined daily doses; aOR, adjusted odds ratio.

*

In the case of propensity score matching analysis, number of patients was estimated after matching.