Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;12(7):3103–3112. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.012

Table 1.

The prediction of binding free energies (ΔGbind, pred), IC50, and metabolic stability RLM t1/2 of target compounds.

No. R1 ΔGbind, pred (kcal/mol) IC50 (nmol/L)a RLM t1/2 (min)
10 –H −33.22 ± 3.46 117 ± 6
11 –F −35.50 ± 2.31 51 ± 3
12 –OH −32.14 ± 3.05 193 ± 17
13 Image 2 −36.52 ± 2.85 591 ± 11
14 Image 3 −37.27 ± 3.01 593 ± 69
15 Image 4 −37.94 ± 2.85 11 ± 1 169
16 Image 5 −40.93 ± 2.66 4.6 ± 0.6 6
17 Image 6 −39.68 ± 2.66 5.0 ± 0.3 16
18 Image 7 −43.03 ± 2.61 20 ± 2
19 Image 8 −38.80 ± 2.42 40 ± 1
20 Image 9 −41.17 ± 2.33 52 ± 5
21 Image 10 −37.38 ± 3.02 597 ± 61
22 Image 11 −43.04 ± 2.53 3.1 ± 0.2 8
23 Image 12 −42.34 ± 3.27 4.8 ± 0.3 39
24 Image 13 −41.24 ± 2.75 5.9 ± 0.6 27
25 Image 14 −39.57 ± 2.78 13 ± 2

2.1.

a

Data are given as mean ± SD (n ≥ 3).