Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 17;36(4):1021–1028. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00728-7

Table 2.

Correlation between IAP, GP and UBP in supine and with 45 degree anti-trendelenburg elevation, in baseline and with wlwvated IAP to 15 mmHg

Position Mean (SD) by group of IAP and significance of position's diff p-value (IAP: baseline Vs 15 mmHg) Correlation with IAP (all groups)
Supine 9.1 (1.8) p- valuea 15.0 (0.00) p- valueb NA R p-value
IAP 45 Degr 9.4 (2.2) 15.0 (0.00) NA
GI Supine 10.0 (3.6) 17.00 (3.8)  < 0.001 0.875  < 0.001
45 Degr 10.8 (3.8) 0.713 16.6 (5.3) 0.531  < 0.001 0.843  < 0.001
Bladder Supine 8.9 (2.9) 14.8 (3.9)  < 0.001 0.847  < 0.001
45 Degr 9.2 (3.8) 0.686 13.3 (4.9) 0.326  < 0.001 0.819  < 0.001
MAP Supine 87.0 (11) 104.0 (11.0)  < 0.01 0.634  < 0.001
45 Degr 99.0 (20.0) 0.760 106.0 (14.0) 0.695 0.33 0.291 0.085
HR Supine 75 (13) 75 (16) 0.71 0.184 0.284
45 Degr 78 (17) 0.718 81 (17) 0.181 0.25 0.152 0.377
MIP Supine 11 (2) 13 (3)  < 0.001 0.407 0.014
45 Degr 10 (2) 0.788 12 (3) 0.021  < 0.001 0.447 0.006
PIP Supine 27 (1) 31 (2)  < 0.005 0.777  < 0.001
45 Degr 24 (3) 0.792 28 (3) 0.004  < 0.001 0.748  < 0.001
Tv Supine 0.63 (0.1) 0.52 (0.1) 0.01 -0.495 0.002
45 Degr 0.65 (0.1) 0.770 0.62 (0.1) 0.016 0.130 -0.366 0.028

p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant

aBy comparing of correlations with IAP

bBy Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test