Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 13;107(1):154–161. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1217

Table 1.

Summary of direct membrane mosquito-feeding assays grouped by clinical and diagnosis status

Characteristic Symptomatic, microscopic (n = 57) Asymptomatic, microscopic (n = 18) Asymptomatic, sub-microscopic (n = 30) Overall (N = 105)
Gender, n (%)
 Female 25 (44) 8 (44) 12 (40) 45 (43)
 Male 32 (56) 10 (56) 18 (60) 60 (57)
Parasite density, parasites/μL; median (IQR) 2,700 (772–5,320)* 131.5 (63–326.5)* 7.76 (3.23–14.43)† 1,570 (143–4,054)
Gametocyte density, gametocytes/μL; median (IQR) 448 (120–669) 24 (3–48) 352 (36– 618)
No. of infectious individuals 44 4 0 48
Total oocysts/infected mosquito, median (IQR) 211 (32.25–1,098.25) 5 (4.25–15.50) 0 (0–0) 167.5 (22.25–988)
Mosquito infection prevalence,‡ %; median (IQR) 76 (40–91.19) 7.22 (5.4–19.16) 0 (0–0) 74.75 (33.52–90.28)
Intensity of infection, mean ± SD 22.14 ± 29.96 0.65 ± 1.13 0 20.35 ± 29.28
*

Parasite density in symptomatic and asymptomatic microscopic groups was calculated with microscopy only.

Parasite density in the symptomatic sub-microscopic group was quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods, but we could not differentiate sexual stage from asexual stage.

Mosquito infection prevalence calculated for positive infections only.