Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;32(2):10460. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2022.10460

Table 2.

Demographic, clinical, respiratory variables at time of testing and clinical course of the mild group.

Patient Genre Age Days of symptoms Symptoms suggesting phrenic nerve damage Respiratory variables Clinical course
Ventilation disturbances Costal pain Hiccups Oxygen Saturation Supplemental Oxygen
1 M 76 7 No No No 95% No Good
2 M 85 9 No No No 97% No Good
3 M 43 7 No No No 98% No Good
4 F 69 8 No No No 96% NC 4 L Good
5 F 48 11 Yes No No 99% NC 2 L Good
6 M 54 11 No No No 96% No Good
7 M 31 6 No No No 96% No Good
8 M 68 17 Yes No No 92% NC 4 L ICU during 6 days -> Good at discharge
9 M 41 6 Yes No No 95% No Good
10 F 59 8 No No No 95% NC 2 L Good

In one patient (number 9), we performed only nerve conduction of both phrenic nerves performing sonography during the hospital admission. MEP = Motor Evoked Potential, Dif = Difference, M = Male, F= Female, NC = Nasal Cannula, ICU = Intensive Care Unit.