Table 3.
Multinomial logistic regression with loot box purchasing sole predictor of at-risk and problem gambling
| Panel A: Advertisements sample | ||||||||
| At-risk gambling | Problem gambling | |||||||
| B | SE | OR | Wald st | B | SE | OR | Wald st | |
| (Intercept) | −1.326*** | 0.273 | 23.606 | 0.560*** | 0.157 | 12.755 | ||
| Paid for LB in last 4 weeks | 1.945*** | 0.360 | 6.992 | 29.228 | 1.842*** | 0.252 | 6.306 | 53.401 |
| Panel B: Qualtrics sample | ||||||||
| At-risk gambling | Problem gambling | |||||||
| B | SE | OR | Wald st | B | SE | OR | Wald st | |
| (Intercept) | −1.280*** | 0.165 | 60.226 | −1.259*** | 0.164 | 59.226 | ||
| Paid for LB in last 4 weeks | 1.121*** | 0.302 | 3.067 | 13.788 | 2.114*** | 0.262 | 8.284 | 65.109 |
Non problem gambling is the reference category for the model. ***significant at the P < 0.001 level.
Non problem gambling is the reference category for the model. ***significant at the P < 0.001 level (2-tailed).