Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 18;22:276. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02069-w

Table 2.

Relationship between urinary incontinence and age or BMI of different grades

Occurrence rate% (95%CI) Cases in group UI (%) Cases in group without UI (%) Univariate analysis
OR(95%CI) p value
Age(years) 50.1 (46.4–53.9) 351 (50.1%) 349 (49.9%)  < 0.001
  18–30 26.2 (17.7–34.6) 28 (8.0%) 79 (22.6%) 1
  31–40 42.0 (34.5–49.4) 73 (20.8%) 101 (28.9%) 2.039 (1.205–3.450) 0.008
  41–50 59.1 (51.1–67.0) 88 (25.1%) 61 (17.5%) 4.070 (2.370–6.990)  < 0.001
  51–60 57.5 (49.6–65.4) 88 (25.1%) 65 (18.6%) 3.820 (2.232–6.536)  < 0.001
   > 60 63.2 (54.4–72.1) 74 (21.1%) 43 (12.3) 4.855 (2.741–8.602)  < 0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 52.2 (47.0–57.3) 193 (52.2%) 177 (47.8%) 0.008
  Underweight (< 18.5) 39.4 (21.8–57.0) 13 (6.7%) 20 (11.3%) 0.710 (0.337–1.495) 0.367
  Normal (18.5–23.9) 47.8 (41.3–54.3) 109 (56.5%) 119 (67.2%) 1
  Overweight (24–27.9) 62.8 (52.4–73.2) 54 (28.0%) 32 (18.1%) 1.842(1.108–3.064) 0.019
  Obesity (≥ 28) 73.9 (54.5–93.3) 17 (8.8%) 6 (3.4%) 3.093 (1.177–8.130) 0.022

CI, Confidence interval; BMI, Body mass index; UI, Urinary incontinence