Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022 Jun 3;26(6):2627–2636. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3146778

TABLE II.

AUC values comparing performance of RADISTAT (ϱ) against region-wise and voxel-wise radiomic descriptors, as well as combinations thereof, via an LDA classifier. Discovery AUCs (across 50 runs of 3-fold cross validation) as well as hold-out validation AUCs are shown for each classification task, with the top-performing strategy bolded.

Classification Task Top 4 Voxel-wise GLCM ξ Top 4 Region-wise GLCM ς RADISTAT ϱ Top 4 Voxel-wise GLCM + RADISTAT [ξ, ϱ] Top 4 Region-wise GLCM + RADISTAT [ς, ϱ]

RCa: Metastatic vs Non-metastatic 2D Discovery (μ ± σ) 0.52 ± 0.08 0.51 ± 0.08 0.81 ± 0.04*, ** 0.77 ± 0.04* 0.74 ± 0.05**
Validation 0.49 0.51 0.72 0.70 0.57

3D Discovery (μ ± σ) 0.62 ± 0.08 0.50 ± 0.08 0.78 ± 0.04*, ** 0.74 ± 0.04* 0.69 ± 0.07**
Validation 0.67 0.51 0.72 0.75 0.57

GBM: Progression vs PsP 2D Training (μ ± σ) 0.50 ± 0.06 0.52 ± 0.05 0.68 ± 0.03*, ** 0.65 ± 0.04* 0.67 ± 0.04**
Validation 0.52 0.63 0.68 0.60 0.72

3D Training (μ ± σ) 0.59 ± 0.06 0.49 ± 0.07 0.62 ± 0.06*, ** 0.67 ± 0.04 * 0.64 ± 0.06**
Validation 0.61 0.59 0.63 0.59 0.60

μ: mean AUC; σ: standard deviation of AUC (across all cross-validation runs)

*

: adjusted p ≤ 0.05 when comparing AUCs between a descriptor and ξ

**

: adjusted p ≤ 0.05 when comparing AUCs between a descriptor and ς

All p-values corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferonni’s correction