Table 4.
Random intercept-only models testing Hypothesis 1: the effects of condition on outcome variables for the sample of participants who completed surveys within 30 days since their country’s rise in restrictions
| B | SE | t | df | rp | 95% CI around rp | P value | Variance of random effects | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||||
| Autonomous motivation | |||||||||
| Controlling (intercept) | 6.35 | 0.07 | 92.55 | 3.07 | 0.120 | 0.082 | 0.167 | <0.001 | 0.00 |
| Vs. no message | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.68 | 1,976.40 | 0.038 | 0.003 | 0.081 | 0.094 | |
| Vs. autonomy supportive | 0.24 | 0.05 | 5.24 | 1,980.63 | 0.117 | 0.073 | 0.160 | <0.001 | |
| Covariate: Total cases per million | −2.78E-06 | 4.26E-05 | −0.07 | 2.39 | -0.003 | -0.051 | -0.001 | 0.953 | |
| Controlled motivation | |||||||||
| Controlling (intercept) | 4.97 | 0.24 | 20.91 | 5.43 | 0.123 | 0.085 | 0.170 | <0.001 | 0.07 |
| Vs. no message | −0.36 | 0.07 | −4.89 | 1,976.52 | –0.107 | –0.151 | –0.064 | <0.001 | |
| Vs. autonomy supportive | −0.23 | 0.08 | −2.92 | 1,977.58 | –0.064 | –0.108 | –0.021 | 0.004 | |
| Covariate: Total cases per million | 1.01E-04 | 1.49E-04 | 0.68 | 6.97 | 0.064 | 0.020 | 0.108 | 0.519 | |
| Defiance | |||||||||
| Controlling (intercept) | 2.66 | 0.09 | 29.17 | 2.23 | 0.227 | 0.188 | 0.270 | 0.001 | 0.00 |
| Vs. no message | −0.42 | 0.07 | −5.83 | 1,955.26 | –0.130 | –0.173 | –0.087 | <0.001 | |
| Vs. autonomy supportive | −0.74 | 0.07 | −9.84 | 1,960.96 | –0.217 | –0.258 | –0.175 | <0.001 | |
| Covariate: Total cases per million | 1.10E-04 | 5.49E-05 | 2.01 | 1.51 | 0.074 | 0.030 | 0.118 | 0.222 | |
| Intention to avoid next 1 wk | |||||||||
| Controlling (intercept) | 6.44 | 0.06 | 104.98 | 0.94 | 0.070 | 0.037 | 0.120 | 0.008 | 0.00 |
| Vs. no message | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.75 | 1,929.64 | 0.017 | 0.001 | 0.062 | 0.451 | |
| Vs. autonomy supportive | 0.10 | 0.06 | 1.66 | 1,943.00 | 0.038 | 0.003 | 0.082 | 0.097 | |
| Covariate: Total cases per million | 7.05E-05 | 3.49E-05 | 2.02 | 0.52 | 0.059 | 0.015 | 0.103 | 0.433 | |
| Intention to avoid next 6 mo | |||||||||
| Controlling (intercept) | 15.71 | 2.07 | 7.59 | 5.91 | 0.445 | 0.411 | 0.479 | <0.001 | 14.32 |
| Vs. no message | −0.38 | 0.22 | −1.75 | 1,893.51 | –0.029 | –0.074 | –0.002 | 0.080 | |
| Vs. autonomy supportive | −0.25 | 0.23 | −1.10 | 1,892.62 | –0.018 | –0.063 | –0.001 | 0.273 | |
| Covariate: Total cases per million | 3.08E-03 | 8.80E-04 | 3.50 | 45.63 | 0.445 | 0.410 | 0.479 | 0.001 | |
B is the unstandardized coefficient; rp is the partial standardized effect size for each coefficient. N = 1,981. Controlling: n = 600; no message: n = 760; autonomy supportive: n = 621. The controlling message was the reference group. We report three decimal places for p and rp and its 95% CI since our interval null is rp = –0.025 to 0.025 and two decimals for all other values. df, degree of freedom.