Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 17;11(1):1778–1786. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2095932

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effect of Omicron BA.1 re-infection in 614G convalescent Syrian golden hamsters. (A) Detection of viral genome in throat swabs of 614G infected Syrian golden hamsters prior to re-challenge. The mean of each group is shown as solid line, SEM displayed as shading. Data of individual animals is depicted as dashed line. Time point of re-challenge with Omicron BA.1 (13 dpi) is indicated with a red star.(B) Relative body weight of immunologically naïve hamsters infected with Omicron and convalescent hamsters re-challenged with Omicron BA.1. The mean of each group is shown as solid line, SEM displayed as shading. Significant statistic differences were calculated with 2-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. (C) Detection of viral genome in throat swabs of immunologically naïve hamsters infected with Omicron BA.1 and convalescent hamsters re-challenged with Omicron. The mean of each group is shown as solid line, SEM displayed as shading. Significant statistic differences (****p < 0.0001) were calculated with 2-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. (D) Representative gross pathological lesions of animals inoculated with (I) Omicron BA.11 or (II) 614G convalescent and Omicron BA.1 re-challenged animals. Foci (*) of pulmonary consolidation. (E) Detection of SARS-CoV-2 genome2 in respiratory tissue of infected hamsters. Significant statistic differences were calculated with unpaired t-test (*: p < 0.05). (F-I) Histopathological changes and viral antigen expression in nasal turbinates and lungs of re-challenged Syrian golden hamsters. (F) H&E staining and (G) IHC of lungs. (H) H&E staining and (I) IHC of nasal turbinates. Bars indicate 200 µm for images of the lungs and 20 µm for the nasal turbinates. 1,2 Data shown for comparison to Omicron BA.1 inoculated hamsters are based on data shown in Figure 1 (1) and Figure 3 (2).