Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 19;72(1):70–83. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01681-0

Table 1.

Overview of SLO supporting factors in TFN-Diavik and ERFN-Cameco case studies

Factors TFN-Diavik ERFN-Cameco
Legislation and permit process

● Duty to consult

● MVRMA board comprises 50% Indigenous and 50% government representatives.

● Duty to consult

● The provincial consultation policy framework for Indigenous peoples

Indigenous rights and governance

● Constitutional rights (duty to consult)

● Signed modern treaties with the federal government

● Self-government

● Constitutional rights (duty to consult)

● Signed historical treaties with the federal government

● Saskatchewan’s First Nations and Métis Consultation Policy Framework

Industry-state agreements

● Socio-Economic Monitoring Agreement

● Environmental Agreement

● Mine Surface Lease Agreement.

● Human Resource Development Agreement

Type of interaction

● State-community: self and co-management

● State-company: hierarchical

● Company-community: privatized

● State-community: hierarchical and non-co-management

● State-company: hierarchical

● Company-community: Privatized

Industry-community agreement ● Participation Agreement ● Collaboration Agreement
Management and monitoring entities

● Diavik Environmental Agreement —Environmental Monitoring Advisory Board (EMAB)

● Communities Advisory Board

● Community Vitality Monitoring Partnership Process (CVMPP)

● Environmental Quality Committees (EQC)