Table 1.
Overview of SLO supporting factors in TFN-Diavik and ERFN-Cameco case studies
Factors | TFN-Diavik | ERFN-Cameco |
---|---|---|
Legislation and permit process |
● Duty to consult ● MVRMA board comprises 50% Indigenous and 50% government representatives. |
● Duty to consult ● The provincial consultation policy framework for Indigenous peoples |
Indigenous rights and governance |
● Constitutional rights (duty to consult) ● Signed modern treaties with the federal government ● Self-government |
● Constitutional rights (duty to consult) ● Signed historical treaties with the federal government ● Saskatchewan’s First Nations and Métis Consultation Policy Framework |
Industry-state agreements |
● Socio-Economic Monitoring Agreement ● Environmental Agreement |
● Mine Surface Lease Agreement. ● Human Resource Development Agreement |
Type of interaction |
● State-community: self and co-management ● State-company: hierarchical ● Company-community: privatized |
● State-community: hierarchical and non-co-management ● State-company: hierarchical ● Company-community: Privatized |
Industry-community agreement | ● Participation Agreement | ● Collaboration Agreement |
Management and monitoring entities |
● Diavik Environmental Agreement —Environmental Monitoring Advisory Board (EMAB) ● Communities Advisory Board |
● Community Vitality Monitoring Partnership Process (CVMPP) ● Environmental Quality Committees (EQC) |