Table 5.
Students Satisfaction with the educational training tutorial about the clinical problem-solving process (post educational tutorial) (N = 129)
| No | Statements | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: | ||||||||
| 1 | The educational tutorial stimulated my interest in Clinical problem-solving process. | 37 (28.7) | 75 (58.1) | 13 (10.1) | 3 (2.3) | 1 (0.8) | 4.12 (0.74) | 4 (0) |
| 2 | Methods of Clinical problem-solving process introduced in this educational tutorial are beneficial. | 37 (28.7) | 66 (51.2) | 22 (17.1) | 4 (3.1) | 0 | 4.05 (0.76) | 4 (0) |
| 3 | I enjoyed participating in this education training. | 35 (27.1) | 56 (43.4) | 29 (22.5) | 7 (5.4) | 2 (1.6) | 3.89 (0.92) | 4 (1) |
| 4 | The educational tutorial was easy to understand. | 28 (21.7) | 42 (32.6) | 34 (26.4) | 23 (17.8) | 2 (1.6) | 3.55 (1.07) | 4 (1) |
| 5 | The educational tutorial made me understand the concept of Clinical problem-solving process. | 45 (34.9) | 60 (46.5) | 21 (16.3) | 3 (2.3) | 0 | 4.14 (0.77) | 4 (0) |
| 6 | The educational tutorial helped me understand the importance of Clinical problem-solving process. | 45 (34.9) | 52 (40.3) | 30 (23.3) | 2 (1.6) | 0 | 4.09 (0.80) | 4 (0) |
| 7 | The educational tutorial enhanced my learning. | 50 (38.8) | 60 (46.5) | 16 (12.4) | 3 (2.3) | 0 | 4.22 (0.75) | 4 (0) |
| 8 | Wide knowledge area covered. | 47 (36.4) | 49 (38.0) | 29 (22.5) | 4 (3.1) | 0 | 4.08 (0.84) | 4 (0) |
| 9 | Wide range of clinical skills covered. | 53 (41.1) | 48 (37.2) | 25 (19.4) | 3 (2.3) | 0 | 4.17 (0.82) | 4 (0) |
| 10 | The educational tutorial well structured & sequenced. | 36 (27.9) | 57 (44.2) | 30 (23.3) | 4 (3.1) | 2 (1.6) | 3.94 (0.88) | 4 (0) |
| 11 | Student aware of level of data and skills needed. | 46 (35.7) | 51 (39.5) | 27 (20.9) | 4 (3.1) | 1 (0.8) | 4.06 (0.87) | 4 (0) |
| Part B: | ||||||||
| 1 | DI resources instructions well administered. | 55 (42.6) | 59 (45.7) | 13 (10.1) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.8) | 4.29 (0.74) | 4 (0) |
| 2 | DI resources skills are beneficial. | 54 (41.9) | 54 (41.9) | 9 (7.0) | 3 (2.3) | 0 | 4.30 (0.70) | 4 (1) |
| 3 | Data Collection part instructions well administrated. | 41 (31.8) | 56 (43.4) | 28 (21.7) | 4 (3.1) | 0 | 4.04 (0.81) | 4 (0) |
| 4 | Data Collection part is clear. | 42 (32.6) | 48 (37.2) | 30 (23.3) | 8 (6.2) | 1 (0.8) | 3.95 (0.94) | 4 (1) |
| 5 | Data Collection part is beneficial. | 53 (41.1) | 57 (44.2) | 15 (11.6) | 4 (3.1) | 0 | 4.23 (0.78) | 4 (0) |
| 6 | Medication’s assessment template instructions well administrated. | 43 (33.3) | 54 (41.9) | 25 (19.4) | 5 (3.9) | 2 (1.6) | 4.02 (0.91) | 4 (0) |
| 7 | Medication’s assessment part is clear. | 42 (32.6) | 51 (39.5) | 24 (18.6) | 10 (7.8) | 2 (1.6) | 3.94 (0.98) | 4 (0) |
| 8 | Medication’s assessment part is beneficial. | 58 (45.0) | 44 (34.1) | 22 (17.1) | 3 (2.3) | 2 (1.6) | 4.19 (0.91) | 4 (0) |
| 9 | The educational training helped me to be able to identify treatment-related problems (TRPs). | 54 (41.9) | 49 (38.0) | 20 (15.5) | 3 (2.3) | 3 (2.3) | 4.15 (0.93) | 4 (0) |
| 10 | Care plan template instructions well administrated. | 43 (33.3) | 54 (41.9) | 26 (20.2) | 3 (2.3) | 3 (2.3) | 4.02 (0.92) | 4 (0) |
| 11 | Care plan part is clear. | 46 (35.7) | 50 (38.8) | 22 (17.1) | 9 (7.0) | 2 (1.6) | 4.00 (0.98) | 4 (0) |
| 12 | Care plan part is beneficial. | 57 (44.2) | 53 (41.1) | 14 (10.9) | 5 (3.9) | 0 | 4.26 (0.80) | 4 (0) |
| 13 | Patient education instructions well administrated. | 60 (46.5) | 48 (37.2) | 17 (13.2) | 4 (3.1) | 0 | 4.27 (0.81) | 4 (1) |
| 14 | Patient education part is clear. | 58 (45.0) | 48 (37.2) | 20 (15.5) | 3 (2.3) | 0 | 4.25 (0.80) | 4 (1) |
| 15 | Patient education part is beneficial. | 53 (41.1) | 58 (45.0) | 15 (11.6) | 3 (2.3) | 0 | 4.25 (0.75) | 4 (0) |
| 16 | It is beneficial to include the skills learned in different courses like therapeutics, OTC, training, clinical biochemistry, DI etc. | 56 (43.4) | 43 (33.3) | 20 (15.5) | 8 (6.2) | 2 (1.6) | 4.11 (0.99) | 4 (0) |
| Part C: | ||||||||
| 1 | Hospital case evaluation was fair. | 18 (14.0) | 60 (46.5) | 32 (24.8) | 18 (14.0) | 1 (0.8) | 3.59 (0.92) | 4 (1) |
| 2 | Final exam was fair. | 47 (36.4) | 53 (41.1) | 25 (19.4) | 4 (3.1) | 0 | 4.11 (0.82) | 4 (0) |
| 3 | Exams well administered. | 38 (29.5) | 64 (49.6) | 25 (19.4) | 2 (1.6) | 0 | 4.07 (0.74) | 4 (0) |
| 4 | Exams very stressful. | 32 (24.8) | 34 (26.4) | 32 (24.8) | 18 (14.0) | 13 (10.1) | 3.42 (1.28) | 4 (1) |
| 5 | Exams well structured & sequenced. | 38 (29.5) | 52 (40.3) | 33 (25.6) | 5 (3.9) | 1 (0.8) | 3.94 (0.88) | 4 (0) |
| 6 | Personality, ethnicity, and gender do not affect scores. | 63 (48.8) | 36 (27.9) | 23 (17.8) | 5 (3.9) | 2 (1.6) | 4.19 (0.97) | 4 (0) |
5: strongly agree; 4: agree; 3: neutral; 2: disagree; 1: strongly disagree.