Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prenat Diagn. 2022 May 1;42(8):1004–1007. doi: 10.1002/pd.6155

TABLE 1.

Rates (per 1000 eligible patients) and adjusted odds of Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) use

Cohort NIPT rate Adjusted OR (95% CI) P
Total patients (n = 22,393) 201.2
Insurance
 Medicaid (n = 7106) 48.7 0.18 (0.16–0.20) <0.001
 Commercial (n = 15,287) 272.1 Ref
Teaching hospital
 Yes (n = 5025) 182.1 1.15 (0.80–1.67) 0.453
 No (n = 17,368) 206.8 Ref
Zip-code sociodemographicsa
Proportion of Black/Hispanic residents
 High (n = 4886) 123.0 0.80 (0.70–0.90) <0.001
 Low (n = 14,586) 223.2 Ref
Proportion living below the FPL
 High (n = 3584) 107.7 0.80 (0.70–0.93) 0.003
 Low (n = 15,886) 218.4 Ref

Note: The model included hospital random effects and clustered standard errors at the hospital level.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NIPT, non-invasive prenatal testing; OR, odds ratio; Ref, referent.

The model included hospital random effects and clustered standard errors at the hospital level.

a

Zip-code sociodemographic indicators were derived from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey and defined based on patient zip-code at time of delivery and the population proportion of Black/Hispanic residents or residents living below 100% the FPL within each zip-code.