Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 19;13:4181. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31792-5

Fig. 6. Li-ion storage performance of the all-solid-state lithium metal batteries with different cathodes and all-solid-state polymer electrolytes (CR2032 coin cell, 70 °C).

Fig. 6

a, b Comparison of the charge/discharge voltage profiles of a LMFP|PEO-ASPE-Li|Li and b LMFP|FMC-ASPE-Li|Li full cells. c Comparison of discharge capacity retention (DCR) and coulombic efficiency (CE) of LiMn0.6Fe0.4PO4 (LMFP)|PEO-ASPE-Li|Li and LMFP|FMC-ASPE-Li|Li full cells; d, e Comparison of the charge/discharge voltage profiles of d single-crystal LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (SC-NMC811)|PEO-ASPE-Li|Li and e SC-NMC811|FMC-ASPE-Li|Li full cells. f Comparison of DCR and CE of SC-NMC811|PEO-ASPE-Li|Li and SC-NMC811|FMC-ASPE-Li|Li full cells. g, h Comparison of the charge/discharge voltage profiles of g LiFePO4 (LFP)|PEO-ASPE-Li|Li and h LFP|FMC-ASPE-Li|Li full cells. i Comparison of DCR and CE of LFP|PEO-ASPE-Li|Li and LFP|FMC-ASPE-Li|Li full cells. The mass of the positive electrode active material was used for calculating the specific capacity and specific current.