Table 2.

Effect of CAS on primary outcomes: home visits and counselling to mothers and pregnant women

	MP		Bihar
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
Mothers of children <12 months (n=6635)
% of mothers who received adequate number of home visits in last 3 months
Beta	0.06 (0.03–0.10); p<0.001	0.08 (0.04–0.13); p<0.001	0.07 (0.04–0.10); p<0.001	0.08 (0.04–0.12); p<0.001
Comparison mean	0.42	0.42	0.24	0.24
% of mothers who received at least 50% of the correct counselling messages as per their life stage
Beta	0.11 (0.08–0.14); p<0.001	0.12 (0.07–0.16); p<0.001	0.08 (0.06–0.10); p<0.001	0.08 (0.05–0.11); p<0.001
Comparison mean	0.28	0.28	0.09	0.09
Pregnant women in third trimester (n=2398)
% of pregnant women who received adequate no of home visits in the third trimester
Beta	0.02 (−0.03 to 0.08); p=0.41	0.03 (−0.04 to 0.11); p=0.35	0.02 (−0.03 to 0.07); p=0.35	0.03 (−0.03 to 0.09); p=0.33
Comparison mean	0.55	0.55	0.27	0.26
% of pregnant women who received at least 50% of the correct counselling messages as per their life stage
Beta	0.09 (0.04–0.15); p<0.001	0.09 (0.02–0.16); p=0.01	0.05 (0.00–0.10); p=0.04	0.03 (−0.02 to 0.09); p=0.25
Comparison Mean	0.43	0.43	0.24	0.23

CAS, Common Application Software.