Table 3.

Effect of CAS on secondary outcomes: growth monitoring and supplementary nutrition services by community health workers

	MP		Bihar
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
Growth monitoring of infants <12 months (n=6635)
% of mothers who reported that their child aged 0–12 months was weighed by CHNW at least once in last 3 months
Beta	0.00 (−0.03 to 0.04); p=0.87	0.01 (−0.03 to 0.05); p=0.66	0.22 (0.18–0.25); p<0.001	0.24 (0.19–0.28); p<0.001
Comparison mean	0.66	0.66	0.18	0.17
% of mothers who reported that CHNW discussed their child’s weight or showed child’s growth chart
Beta	−0.02 (−0.05 to 0.01); p=0.20	−0.00 (−0.05 to 0.04); p=0.86	0.15 (0.13–0.18); p<0.001	0.15 (0.13–0.20); p<0.001
Comparison mean	0.48	0.48	0.15	0.15
THR supplementation to mothers of children <12 months (n=6635)
% of mothers (0–12 months child) who received THR at least once a month from CHNW
Beta	−0.01 (−0.04 to 0.01); p=0.34	−0.00 (−0.04 to 0.04); p=0.86	−0.04 (−0.07 to 0.00); p=0.046	−0.03 (−0.08 to 0.02); p=0.24
Comparison mean	0.72	0.72	0.35	0.34
% of mothers (0–12 months child) who recall being counselled about mother’s/child’s THR consumption by CHNW in last 3 months
Beta	0.09 (0.06–0.12); p<0.001	0.10 (0.05–0.14); p<0.001	0.08 (0.06–0.10); p<0.001	0.09 (0.06–0.12); p<0.001
Comparison mean	0.39	0.39	0.15	0.14

CHNW, community health and nutrition worker; THR, take-home ration.