Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;13:916497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916497

TABLE 9.

The summary of our hypotheses test.

Supported Not supported Content of hypotheses
H1 H1a, H1b, H1c ICT use intensity moderated the link of ICT use with reading literacy
H2 H2a, H2b, H2c ICT use intensity moderated the link of ICT use with UR.
H3 H3a, H3b, H3c ICT use intensity moderated the link of ICT use with SM.
H4 H4a, H4b, H4c ICT use intensity moderated the link of ICT use with AC.
H5 H5a, H5b, H5c ICT use intensity did not moderate the link of UR with reading literacy.
H6 H6a, H6b, H6c ICT use intensity did not moderate the link of SM with reading literacy.
H7 H7a, H7b, H7c ICT use intensity did not moderate the link of AC with reading literacy.
H8 H8a, H8b H8c ENTUSE and HOMESCH intensity moderated the link of ENTUSE and HOMESCH with reading literacy, while USESCH intensity did not moderate the corresponding link, after controlling for the mediation of metacognition.

ENTUSE, ICT use at home for recreational activities; HOMESCH, ICT use at home for schoolwork; USESCH, ICT use at school in general; UR, Understanding and Remembering (one aspect of metacognition); SM, Summarizing (one aspect of metacognition); AC, Assessing credibility of information (one aspect of metacognition).