Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;16(14):2632–2657. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13175

Table 1.

Gene expression variability upon Abi1 depletion in primary PyMT breast cancer tumors defined by RNA‐seq.

Mouse ID G144 G164 G184 G174 Fold change depletion
Genotype fl/wt fl/wt fl/fl fl/fl
Cre + + Heterozygous Homozygous Ratio Treatment Effect a
Gene expression (RNA‐seq from primary tumors) Abi1 14389 7343 15682 1018 1.96 15.40 7.86 Yes
Abi2 8173 7189 8031 9719 1.14 0.83 0.73 No
Abi3 146 271 343 195 0.54 1.76 3.26 Yes
Nckap1 36435 34964 40591 38802 1.04 1.05 1.00 No
Wasf1 88 66 85 118 1.33 0.72 0.54 No
Wasf2 8563 10349 13894 11087 0.83 1.25 1.51 No
Wasf3 261 151 95 221 1.73 0.43 0.25 Yes
Brk1 10240 9103 11091 9920 1.12 1.12 0.99 No
Cyfip1 23448 22528 31708 23030 1.04 1.38 1.32 No
Cyfip2 521 1289 1633 580 0.40 2.82 6.97 Yes
Rac1 25732 22621 27209 24431 1.14 1.11 0.98 No
Ndel1 10923 10842 15082 13030 1.01 1.16 1.15 No
a

Treatment effect is ‘positive’ (yes) if the fold change of gene expression for heterozygous and homozygous mice changed more than 1.5 times (bold text) in any direction and ‘negative’ (no) in other cases. RNA‐seq. expression profiles of WAVE complex, and Rac1 and Ndel1 genes (involved in WAVE complex stability and functionality) show the differences between heterozygous vs. homozygous Abi1 KO PyMT mammary tumors.