Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 31;30(23):6021–6035. doi: 10.1111/mec.16240

TABLE 1.

Pairwise contrasts of the marginal estimated means of recovered loci per sample between multi‐kmer and single‐kmer strategies and between both multi‐kmer strategies

Pairwise comparisons among strategies Completeness of alignments WGS 10× read depth Target sequence capture
Estimate p‐value Estimate p‐value
abyss Multikmer ‐ abyss 21 Unprocessed 136 <.0001 126 <.0001
abyss Multikmer ‐ abyss 33 99 <.0001 120 <.0001
abyss Multikmer ‐ abyss 55 143 <.0001 115 <.0001
abyss Multikmer ‐ abyss 77 191 <.0001 104 <.0001
abyss Multikmer ‐ spades 68 <.0001 85 <.0001
spadesabyss 21 68 <.0001 41 .012
spadesabyss 33 31 .1311 35 .0535
spadesabyss 55 75 <.0001 30 .1386
spadesabyss 77 123 <.0001 19 .6389
abyss Multikmer ‐ abyss 21 Processed 117 <.0001 107 <.0001
abyss Multikmer ‐ abyss 33 81 <.0001 102 <.0001
abyss Multikmer ‐ abyss 55 129 <.0001 100 <.0001
abyss Multikmer ‐ abyss 77 180 <.0001 92 <.0001
abyss Multikmer ‐ spades 27 .2523 44 .006
spadesabyss 21 90 <.0001 63 <.0001
spadesabyss 33 54 .0002 58 <.0001
spadesabyss 55 102 <.0001 56 .0001
spadesabyss 77 153 <.0001 48 .0015

Contrasts are made considering an average of 10× coverage for the low‐coverage WGS and the target sequence capture data sets. Standard error = 12.4 for all pairwise comparisons; degrees of freedom = 477 for all pairwise comparisons