Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 26;23(6):e202100340. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202100340

Table 4.

ETBR signaling in response to ET‐1 and antagonist‐blocked ETAR. COS‐7 cells, expressing both ETBR and ETAR stimulated with either the non‐selective ET‐1 in the absence or presence of the ETAR‐selective antagonist sitaxentan. Ca2+ flux was monitored in duplicates and concentration‐response curved represent the average over all assay repetitions (n≥3).

Co‐transfection ratio

Relative Ca2+ flux initiated by ETBR‐GFP

ETBR expression

ET‐1+vehicle

ET‐1+sitaxentan

[%] ±SEM

EC50 [nM]

pEC50 ±SEM

[%] ±SEM

EC50 [nM]

pEC50 ±SEM

[%] ±SEM

ETBR/ETAR

1 : 0

100±1

0.7

9.2±0.06

100±3

0.5

9.3±0.09

89±4

1 : 1

149±8

0.7

9.1±0.14

73±4

0.4

9.4±0.12

49±3