Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 20;155(Suppl 1):61–85. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13878

TABLE 2.

Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum: FIGO staging (2014) compared with TNM classification a

FIGO (Designate primary: Tov, Tft, Tp, or Tx) UICC
T N M
Stage
IA T1a N0 M0
IB T1b N0 M0
IC T1c N0 M0
IIA T2a N0 M0
IIB T2b N0 M0
IIIA T3a N0 M0
T3a N1 M0
IIIB T3b N0 M0
T3b N1 M0
IIIC T3c N0−1 M0
T3c N1 M0
IV Any T Any N M1
Regional nodes (N)
Nx Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
N1 Regional lymph node metastasis
Distant metastasis (M)
Mx Distant metastasis cannot be assessed
M0 No distant metastasis
M1 Distant metastasis (excluding peritoneal metastasis)

1. The primary site—that is, ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum—should be designated where possible. In some cases, it may not be possible to clearly delineate the primary site, and these should be listed as “undesignated”.

2. The histologic type should be recorded.

3. The staging includes a revision of the Stage III patients and allotment to Stage IIIA1 is based on spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes without intraperitoneal dissemination, because an analysis of these patients indicates that their survival is significantly better than those who have intraperitoneal dissemination.

4. Involvement of retroperitoneal lymph nodes must be proven cytologically or histologically.

5. Extension of tumor from omentum to spleen or liver (Stage IIIC) should be differentiated from isolated parenchymal splenic or liver metastases (Stage IVB).

a

Source: Prat J. 17