Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;60(48):25252–25257. doi: 10.1002/anie.202110304

Table 1.

Reaction optimization.[a] Inline graphic

Entry

Variation from “standard conditions”

Yield [%][b]

1

None

81

2

N2 instead of N1

55

3

N3 instead of N1

<5

4

N4 instead of N1

<5

5

Na2CO3 instead of Cs2CO3

<5

6

K2CO3 instead of Cs2CO3

<5

7

benzoyl chloride instead of benzoyl fluoride

<5

8

[Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6 instead of 4CzIPN

84

9

Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 instead of 4CzIPN

<5

10

Ir(dF(CF3)ppy2)(5,5′‐dCF3bpy)PF6 instead of 4CzIPN

<5

11

Without 4CzIPN

<5

12

Without N1

<5

13

In dark

<5

graphic file with name ANIE-60-25252-g005.jpg

[a] Reaction conditions: 1 a (0.25 mmol), 2 a (0.10 mmol), N1 (10 mol %), 4CzIPN (5 mol %), Cs2CO3 (0.20 mmol) in anhydrous 1,2‐DCE (1.0 mL), irradiation with blue LED at room temperature for 12 h. [b] isolated yield.