Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;13:884261. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.884261

Table 3.

Comparison of intervention effects to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Fugl–Meyer assessment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE), wolf motor arm function test (WMFT), WMFT-FAS, and action research arm test (ARAT) assessments.

Group T2 - baseline
MCID Mean Percentage
FMA-UE CT 9 7.56 22.22% (2/9)
RBMT 9.20 70% (7/10)*
WMFT-FAS CT 0.3 0.46 66.67% (6/9)
RBMT 0.63 90.00% (9/10)
WMFT-time (s) CT 9 14.93 33.33% (3/9)
RBMT 18.02 40.00% (4/10)
ARAT CT 12 9.10 22.22% (2/9)
RBMT 5.78 40.00% (4/10)
*

p < 0.05, Chi-squared test.