Table 3.
Need | Rationale | Action |
---|---|---|
Increased sensitivity of biomarker assays | Measurement of HBV replication below the current limit of detection, particularly in patients who are treated; improved sensitivity will enable prediction of off-treatment remission and cure (sustained response), particularly as serum does not always reflect liver pathology | Diagnostic companies should be encouraged to develop highly sensitive HBV DNA assays; improved sensitivity will also assist in the detection of OBI |
Extrapolation of assays to different patient cohorts | The clinical value of current and emerging biomarkers needs to be assessed in different patient cohorts, including their ability to define phases of HBV natural history | Patient cohorts should include different ethnic groups, HBV (sub)genotypes, higher representation of women, individuals with HIV co-infection, pregnant and lactating people, and children; although these markers can reflect cccDNA transcription in the liver, more understanding is required on the factors regulating their expression |
Combination of assays | It is unclear at present how best to combine biomarkers; there is no ‘silver bullet’ and determining how to integrate multiple markers and their kinetics presents major challenges | Combining HBcrAg, HBsAg and pgRNA levels predicts sustained response following treatment cessation in some settings; although these markers might reflect cccDNA transcription in the liver, more understanding is required on the factors regulating their expression; technical validation of different biomarkers for different treatment modalities in clinical trials is under way or planned; collaborations between multiple clinical trial sites is recommended to obtain sufficient statistical power; a viral biomarker composite score similar to the REACH-B175 might assist clinical decision-making; biomarkers could be combined to generate the score and to predict outcomes such as which patients would benefit from stopping therapy |
Development of core-specific biomarkers | As HBcrAg represents multiple antigens, with HBeAg predominating, a specific core antigen biomarker would be a useful surrogate marker of cccDNA activity as its level is not affected by the presence of basal core promoter and/or precore mutants or peripheral clearance (for example, HBcAg or HBeAg antibodies) being contained in virions | Development of a core-specific biomarker is under way |
Correlation of expression of biomarkers in liver and plasma/serum | It is unclear how accurately HBV serum biomarkers reflect the liver | Further studies in animal models and humans are required to correlate circulating markers with the intrahepatic environment |
Definition of disease progression and treatment response | Biomarkers of treatment response and disease progression are needed | A panel of biomarkers is needed to enable clinicians to identify patients who could cease therapy with a lower risk of relapse; biomarkers of HCC are needed, particularly those that can replace or complement ultrasonography for HCC detection; issues around access to these assays must be improved, particularly in resource-limited settings |
Development of immunological markers | Immunological markers are not as well developed as virological markers | Currently available immunological markers largely measure liver inflammation whereas, ideally, these biomarkers should predict the activity of immune targeting drugs and, ultimately, off-treatment response; to date, measuring cytokines and chemokines in the periphery has been of limited value as they are only present at the time of inflammation |
Further studies on FNA | FNA (also known as needle biopsy) | Understanding the contribution of the relatively few hepatocytes within the FNA and how this correlates with the ‘gold standard’ liver biopsy from both an immunological and virological perspective; as FNAs are a very small representation of a large organ, with inherent risks in terms of sampling error, performing FNAs in large patient populations might be necessary; identifying suitable clinical trial sites with the necessary expertise for collection, processing and storage, and providing training for sites lacking expertise; ideal conditions for the storage of FNAs have not been defined |
cccDNA, covalently closed circular DNA; FNA, fine-needle aspiration; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HBcAg, hepatitis B core antgen; HBcrAg, hepatitis B core-related antigen; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; OBI, occult hepatitis B virus infection; pgRNA, pre-genomic RNA.