Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 20;28(3):899–917. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15960

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Spatial variation in mean C‐N response in forest aboveground woody biomass predicted by the regression model based on spatial variation in soil N content, mean tree age and potential evapotranspiration (PET). Dots indicate regions where the predicted response was not significant (p > .05). Maps showing spatial variation in the upper and lower confidence limits for the C‐N response are shown in Figure S5. Grid cells with <5% forest cover are masked