Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 5;8:e1031. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1031

Table 4. Evaluation results for the proposed E-CNN, its individuals (modified TL models) when number of epochs = 10, and the standard TL models on colon histopathlogical images dataset based on the average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and average standard deviation (STD) in 10 runs, best results in bold.

Pretrained models Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
Standard DenseNet121 90.41 ± 3.1 91.25 ± 2.9 100 ± 0
Standard MobileNetV2 90.27 ± 2.9 88.25 ± 1.9 99.23 ± 2.3
Standard InceptionV3 87.12 ± 2.0 92.75 ± 2.0 100 ± 0
Standard VGG16 62.19 ± 7.0 63.21 ± 7.3 100 ± 9.9
Modified DenseNet121 92.32 ± 2.8 92.99 ± 2.8 100 ± 0.0
Modified MobileNetV2 92.19 ± 3.8 90.75 ± 2.0 100 ± 0.0
Modified InceptionV3 89.86 ± 2.2 95.0 ± 1.5 100 ± 0.0
Modified VGG16 72.73 ± 3.9 73.0 ± 3.6 87.43 ± 12.4
Proposed E-CNN (product) 95.20 ± 1.64 95.62 ± 1.50 100 ± 0.0
Proposed E-CNN (Majority voting) 94.52 ± 1.73 95.0 ± 1.58 100 ± 0.0