Table 4. Evaluation results for the proposed E-CNN, its individuals (modified TL models) when number of epochs = 10, and the standard TL models on colon histopathlogical images dataset based on the average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and average standard deviation (STD) in 10 runs, best results in bold.
Pretrained models | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity |
---|---|---|---|
Standard DenseNet121 | 90.41 ± 3.1 | 91.25 ± 2.9 | 100 ± 0 |
Standard MobileNetV2 | 90.27 ± 2.9 | 88.25 ± 1.9 | 99.23 ± 2.3 |
Standard InceptionV3 | 87.12 ± 2.0 | 92.75 ± 2.0 | 100 ± 0 |
Standard VGG16 | 62.19 ± 7.0 | 63.21 ± 7.3 | 100 ± 9.9 |
Modified DenseNet121 | 92.32 ± 2.8 | 92.99 ± 2.8 | 100 ± 0.0 |
Modified MobileNetV2 | 92.19 ± 3.8 | 90.75 ± 2.0 | 100 ± 0.0 |
Modified InceptionV3 | 89.86 ± 2.2 | 95.0 ± 1.5 | 100 ± 0.0 |
Modified VGG16 | 72.73 ± 3.9 | 73.0 ± 3.6 | 87.43 ± 12.4 |
Proposed E-CNN (product) | 95.20 ± 1.64 | 95.62 ± 1.50 | 100 ± 0.0 |
Proposed E-CNN (Majority voting) | 94.52 ± 1.73 | 95.0 ± 1.58 | 100 ± 0.0 |