Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 20;8(29):eabm4665. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm4665

Fig. 4. Meridional heat transport and heat budget.

Fig. 4.

Left column shows the shell-heating scenario and the right column shows the core-heating scenario. The top panels (A and B) show the vertically integrated meridional OHT for various assumed S0. Positive values denote northward heat transport. The middle panels (C and D) show the inferred tidal heating ^ice (solid curves), in comparison with the heating predicted by a tide model ℋice (dashed curves). As a measure of uncertainties in the tide model, two pα values, −2 and −1, are used to compute ℋice. The black dashed curves in (D) coincide with the zero line, because ℋice = 0 when all heating is in the core. The bottom panels (E and F) show the mismatch index Imis, defined in Eq. 3. Filled colored dots connected by a thick solid line correspond to the default setup (horizontal/vertical diffusivity κh= κv = 0.005 m2/s, horizontal/vertical viscosity νh = νv = 10 m2/s, 100% heat produced in the ice, and melting-point ice viscosity ηm = 1014 Pa·s). Other symbols represent sensitivity tests to ice viscosity, mixing coefficients, and model resolution. The Imix of the low and high ηm experiments are multiplied by a factor of 0.3 and 2, respectively, so that all plots make use of the same scale.