Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;40(8):807–821. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01156-4

Table 4.

Deterministic and probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in the base case

PSMA PET/CT CT+WBBS CT alone Difference
PSMA PET/CT vs CT+WBBS PSMA PET/CT vs CT alone
Base-case results (deterministic)
 Total QALYs gained per patient 8.352 8.336 8.307 0.016 0.044
 Total costs per patient (A$) $35,387 $35,050 $33,775 $337 $1612
 ICER (A$ per QALY gained) $21,147 $36,231
Base-case results (probabilistic)
 Total QALYs gained per patient (95% CI) 8.361 (7.891, 8.779) 8.345 (7.868, 8.764) 8.316 (7.836, 8.739) 0.016 (− 0.002, 0.040) 0.044 (0.029, 0.062)
 Total costs per patient [A$] (95% CI) $35,350 ($27,043, $48,545) $35,008 ($26,668, $48,123) $33,733 ($25,404, $46,890) $342 (− $40, $918) $1617 ($874, $2228)
 ICER [A$ per QALY gained] (95% CI)a $33,836 (− $14,280, $71,865) $37,649 ($18,629, $59,745)

A$ Australian Dollars, CI confidence interval, CT computed tomography, PET positron emission tomography, PSMA prostate-specific membrane antigen, QALYs quality-adjusted life-years, WBBS whole body bone scan

aThe difference in deterministic and probabilistic ICERs is because as the incremental effect approaches zero the ICER moves towards infinity, which biases the average probabilistic ICER upwards