Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 7;12:879086. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.879086

Table 4.

Comparison of mandibular reconstructions with the fibula free flap in both groups: double flap (= I) versus temporal anastomosis (= II).

Group and number of segments Operation time (min) FFF ischemic time (min) Primary tracheotomy (n) Removal of tracheostoma (days) ICU stay (days) Hospital stay (days)
I 1-segmented FFF (n = 3) 704.0 (604.0–744.0) 81.0 (68.0–113.0) 3 6.0 (4.0–13.0) 0.5 (0.5–0.5) 17.0 (17.0–25.0)
II 1-segmented FFF (n = 4) 508.0 (443.0–533.0) 125.5 (120.0–248.0) 1 3.0 3.0 (0.5–11.0) 15.5 (11.0–25.0)
I 2-segmented FFF (n = 6) 661.0 (595.0–832.0) 90.5 (50.0–167.0) 6 3.0 (2.0–41.0) 0.5 (0.5–33.0) 17.5 (11.0–49.0)
II 2-segmented FFF (n = 2) 571.0 (496.0–646.0) 159.0 (153.0–165.0) 1 3.0 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 19.0 (18.0–20.0)
I 3-segmented FFF (n = 8) 641.0 (559.0–994.0) 77.5 (26.0–168.0) 8 14.0 (3.0–41.0) 0.5 (05.–5.0) 21.5 (15.0–43.0)
II 3-segmented FFF (n = 0) / / / / / /

Median (range). group I, double flap group; group II, temporal anastomosis group; FFF, fibula free flap; ICU, intensive care unit.