Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 7;9:878858. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.878858

Table 4.

Sensitivity analysis of deep learning model for external validation dataset.

Variables Nadir90 Fall20 Fall20/MAP10
AUROC (PC, p-value) AUPRC (PC, p-value) AUROC (PC, p-value) AUPRC (PC, p-value) AUROC (PC, p-value) AUPRC (PC, p-value)
Vital signs 0.819 (reference) 0.106 (reference) 0.858 (reference) 0.823 (reference) 0.848 (reference) 0.835 (reference)
Vital signs + Monitored pressure 0.835 (1.9, <0.001) 0.111 (5.1, 0.028) 0.862 (0.5, <0.001) 0.829 (0.7, 0.020) 0.853 (0.6, <0.001) 0.841 (0.7, 0.016)
Vital signs + Setting measures 0.839 (2.5, <0.001) 0.112 (6.1, 0.016) 0.858 (0.1, 0.081) 0.824 (0.1, 0.624) 0.849 (0.0, 0.227) 0.835 (0.0, 1.000)
Vital signs + Time setting 0.830 (1.3, <0.001) 0.108 (2.3, 0.566) 0.856 (−0.2, <0.001) 0.822 (−0.1, 0.636) 0.848 (-0.1, 0.012) 0.835 (0.0, 1.000)

Vital signs included SBP, DBP, MAP, and pulse rate; Monitored pressure included AP, and VP; setting measures included blood flow rate, dialysate flow rate, ultrafiltration rate, total ultrafiltration volume, temperature, and dialysate sodium level. P-values were calculated compared to the models that were trained by only vital signs. The Delong test was used to calculated p-values for comparison of AUROC. The bootstrap method was used to calculated p-values for comparison of AUPRC. MAP, mean arterial pressure; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves; AUPRC, area under the precision-recall curve; PC, percentage change.