Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;67(8):585–597. doi: 10.1177/07067437211065726

Table 1.

Program characteristics of EIS in Quebec in 2020

All programs
(total n = 28)
Programs founded before 2017
(total n = 17)
Programs founded from 2017 and onwards
(total n = 11)
Program characteristics
Access to hospital beds Youth-friendly unit, specific to EIS a 1/28 1/17 0/11
Regular unit in which EIS a patients are grouped, followed by EIS a psychiatrist 3/28 2/17 1/11
Regular unit in which EIS a patients are grouped, followed by any inpatient psychiatrist 3/28 3/17 0/11
Regular unit in which EIS a patients are not grouped, followed by EIS a psychiatrist 7/28 3/17 4/11
Regular unit in which EIS a patients are not grouped, followed by any inpatient psychiatrist 12/28 6/17 6/11
No access to hospital beds 2/28 2/17 0/11
Accessibility and early detection targets
Screening assessment Maximum delay is set by program 19/28 10/17 9/11
Targeted maximum delay in days
Median (range)
3.0 (2-14) 3.0 (2-14) 3.0 (2-3)
Psychiatric assessment Maximum delay is set by program 19/28 10/17 9/11
Targeted maximum delay in days
Median (range)
14.0 (2-30) 14.0 (2-30) 14.0 (3-15)
Time from referral to program entry Maximum delay is set by program 16/28 8/17 8/11
Targeted maximum delay in days
Median (range)
14.0 (3-30) 14.0 (3-30) 7.0 (3-15)
Early detection interventions Public education 4/28 4/17 0/11
Referral sources education 26/28 15/17 11/11
Admission criteria
Lower age limit
(excluding exclusive child and adolescent psychiatric programs)
≤ 12 y.o. a 14/25 6/14 8/11
14-17 y.o. a 6/25 3/14 2/11
18 y.o. a 5/25 4/14 1/11
Higher age limit
(excluding exclusive child and adolescent psychiatric programs)
< 35 y.o. a 7/25 7/14 0/11
≥ 35 y.o. a 18/25 7/14 11/11
Services
Targeted maximum length of follow-up in the program 2 years 3/28 2/17 1/11
3 years 13/28 6/17 7/11
4-5 years 6/28 5/17 1/11
No maximum duration 6/28 4/17 2/11
Services for UHR-P b Formal UHR-P b clinic 6/28 5/17 1/11
Follow-up offered to UHR-P b patients without formal specific program 8/28 6/17 2/11
Standardised care tools Protocol for metabolic monitoring 19/28 11/17 8/11
Maximising engagement
Discharge criteria Maximum program duration completed 22/28 13/17 9/11
Remitted from positive symptoms (even if patient hasn't reached the maximum time allowed in the program) 10/28 5/17 5/11
Patient ceased follow-up, felt better 17/28 11/17 6/11
Patient refusal of treatment 12/28 8/17 4/11
Noncompliance to pharmacological or nonpharmacological interventions 0/28 0/17 0/11
Failure to keep appointments 4/28 2/17 2/11
Others† 10/28 7/17 3/11
Assertive outreach targeting patients who fail to keep appointments or are noncompliant to treatment Yes 28/28 17/17 11/11
Program statistics
Average length of follow-up in the program 1-2 years 15/28 7/17 8/11
3 years 11/28 8/17 3/11
4-5 years 2/28 2/17 0/11
Average number of referrals per year (last 3 years) Mean 67.4 76.7 53.1
Median (range) 60 (2-200) 60 (20-200) 47 (2-130)
Average number of admitted first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients per year (last 3 years) Mean 47.9 51.2 42.8
Median (range) 40 (2-150) 40 (15-150) 38 (2-80)
Access to timely screening assessments 80% of patients contacted within 72h of referral 10/21 7/14 3/7
Access to timely psychiatric evaluation 80% of patients assessed within 2 weeks of referral 16/24 9/15 7/9
Average time from referral to program entry
(days)
Mean 10.5 12.6 7.3
Median (range) 7.5 (1-45) 10.0 (2-45) 7.0 (1-15)
Proportion of time spent on outreach activities 0-10% 2/27 1/16 1/11
11-20% 5/27 5/16 0/11
21-30% 3/27 3/16 0/11
31-40% 6/27 6/16 0/11
> 40% 17/27 7/16 10/11
Patient to case manager ratios < 15:1 7/26 5/15 2/11
15-19:1 11/26 4/15 7/11
20:1-24:1 6/26 4/15 2/11
> 25:1 2/26 2/15 0/11

Total n reported for individual outcomes may differ from the total number of programs, due to missing data (programs who did not answer the question or reported unavailable data).

a

: y.o.: Years old

b

: UHR-P: Ultra-high risk for psychosis

†: Other discharge criteria included patients wrongly admitted to the EIS (n = 1/10), patients whose needs are better fulfilled by other mental health services (n = 3/10; e.g., assertive community treatment), patients who moved outside the catchment area (n = 1/10) or whose whereabouts are untraceable (n = 1/10), and patients who completed their recovery goals (n = 1/10). The 3 child and adolescent psychiatry programs noted that reaching age 18 was a discharge criterion.