Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 7;13:951705. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.951705

Table 2.

Calibration equationsa, correlation coefficients, limits of detection (LOD), limits of quantification (LOQ), and recovery rates for FA, FAX, and FAXG using HSQC-NMR detection.

Range tested (μM) Linear calibration equation Correlation coefficients (R2) LOD (μM) LOQ (μM) Recovery rate (%)
FA 470–2,400 y = 99,366x – 0.0133 0.9829 307 930 103
FAX 120–440 y = 102,034x – 0.0044 0.8578 108 327 75
FAXG 120–350 y = 110,243x – 0.0076 0.7165 153 463 83

FA, 5-O-trans-feruloyl-l-arabinofuranose; FAX, β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-5-O-trans-feruloyl-l-arabinofuranose; FAXG, α-l-galactopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-5-O-trans-feruloyl-l-arabinofuranose; HSQC, heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectroscopy; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance.

a

Calibration equations and correlation coefficients calculated from triplicate calibrations. Recovery rates were determined in duplicate.