Table 2.
Difference in Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology total scoresa by participant and domain between the beginning of phase 1 or 2 and end of phase 3 (detailed results in Multimedia Appendix 5).
| Participant numberb | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Values, mean | ||||||||||||
| Total score | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Phase 1 or 2 | 89 | 63 | 86 | 81 | 87 | 79 | 66 | 75 | 71 | 77 | 77 | |||||||||||
|
|
Phase 3 | 74 | 76 | 80 | 74 | 77 | 72 | N/Ac | 80 | 79 | 72 | 76 | |||||||||||
|
|
Difference | −15 | 13 | −6 | −7 | −10 | −7 | N/A | 5 | 8 | −5 | −2.7 | |||||||||||
| Difference by domains | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Performance expectancy | −2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | N/A | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.33 | |||||||||||
|
|
Effort expectancy | −2 | 4 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | N/A | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.33 | |||||||||||
|
|
Social influence | −3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | −2 | −1 | N/A | −1 | 1 | −1 | −0.67 | |||||||||||
|
|
Voluntariness | −3 | −3 | −5 | −2 | −3 | −3 | N/A | 2 | 3 | −4 | −2 | |||||||||||
|
|
Intention to use | −2 | 3 | −4 | −4 | −6 | 0 | N/A | 2 | 3 | 0 | −0.9 | |||||||||||
|
|
Facilitating conditions | −3 | 3 | 0 | −1 | 1 | −1 | N/A | 1 | 0 | −1 | −0.1 | |||||||||||
aScores for individual questions from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The domain scores ranged from 5 to 15. The total score for all the domains ranged from 30 to 90.
bParticipants 1 to 5: phase 1 and phase 3; participants 6 to 10: phase 2 and phase 3.
cN/A: not applicable; participant 7 expired before phase 3.