Table 3.

Differences in the scores of the items for learning success, course evaluation, and self-assessment between students who watched the videos in an immersive way with a Google Cardboard Viewer and those who viewed non-immersively on a Computer, Tablet or Phone.

	Score: median (IQB)
Item (range)	Non-immersive group N = 74	Immersive group N = 27	p-Value
Learning-Success-Score (0–10)	7 (3)	8 (3)	p = 0.430
How good was the definition of the learning aims? (0–5)	4 (1)	4 (1)	p = 0.077
How well was the course structured and comprehensive? (0–5)	4 (1)	4 (1)	p = 0.008
How would you assess the quality of the teaching media? (0–5)	4 (2)	4 (1)	p = 0.312
How would you assess your own expertise in the topic? (0–5)	3 (1)	4 (2)	p = 0.040
How was the learning atmosphere? (0–5)	4 (2)	4 (1)	p = 0.031
How would you assess your learning success? (0–5)	4 (1)	4 (0)	p = 0.064
Would you recommend the course? (0–5)	4 (2)	4 (1)	p = 0.014
Do you possess a strong technical affinity? (0–5)	3 (1)	4, (1)	p = 0.209
Is virtual reality suitable for teaching practical knowledge during a pandemic? (0–5)	4 (1)	5 (1)	p = 0.000
Did the videos improve your notion of the presented procedures? (0–5)	4 (0)	5 (1)	p = 0.000