Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul;24(7):760–774. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.03.011

Table 2.

Effect of Tumor Sample Coverage on Gene-Level Log2(FC) and MAD

Sample Gene and alteration type Tumor purity, % Coverage Sample MAD TCH solid SCNA log2(FC) TCH solid SCNA call
T01 CCND1 amplification 70 834× 0.22 3.78 Yes
700× 0.22 3.78
600× 0.22 3.78
500× 0.23 3.79
400× 0.23 3.78
300× 0.24 3.77
200× 0.26 3.77
100× 0.3 3.77
50× 0.37 3.77
25× 0.48 3.77
10× 0.69 3.73
0.99 3.72
6.14 4.67
T07 SMARCB1 homozygous deletion 90 337× 0.23 −3.97 Yes
200× 0.26 −3.99
100× 0.31 −4.07
50× 0.4 −3.94
25× 0.52 −3.56
10× 0.78 −3.05
1.1 −1.08
8.43 0.03 No
T06 PTEN heterozygous deletion 80 104× 0.26 −0.9 Yes
50× 0.32 −0.9
25× 0.42 −0.88
10× 0.61 −0.93
0.86 −1.07
4.25 1.02 No

MAD, median absolute deviation; TCH, Texas Children's Hospital.

The measure fails to be within the expected limits. Tumor purity estimated by pathology review.