Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2021 Oct;61(4):606–617. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.005

Table 3.

Trial Retention and Intervention Session Attendance Before and After Adding Prerequisite Orientations Sessions to Screening Protocols

Variables Unadjusted estimates Estimates, regression model 2
Beforea (no orientation sessions) Afterb (orientation sessions) Differencec (after-before) Beforea (no orientation sessions) Afterb (orientation sessions) Differencec (after-before)
Unadjusted estimate Unadjusted estimate Unadjusted estimate (95% CI) Unadjusted estimate Unadjusted estimate Unadjusted estimate (95% CI) Unadjusted difference (95% CI) Adjusted estimate (95% CI) Adjusted estimate (95% CI) Adjusted difference (95% CI)
Trial condition All befored Trial condition All aftere All total All total
Control Intervention Control Intervention
Retention
 SHINE Active control Mindfulness Active control Mindfulness
  Sample size, n 41 44 85 53 56 109 194 85 109 194
  % weighed at 6 months 63.4% 77.3% 86.8% 89.3%
  % weighed at 18 months 58.5% 75.0% 81.1% 85.7%
  % weighed, collapsed 76.5% (67.5, 85.5) 88.1% (82.0, 94.2) 11.6% (0.7, 22.5) 68.8%f (59.0, 78.6) 86.1%g (79.6, 92.6) 17.3%h (5.5, 29.1)
 Get Social Traditional Get social Traditional Get social
  Sample size, n 36 39 75 71 71 142 217 75 142 217
  % weight obtained at 6 months 80.6% 82.1% 94.4% 91.6%
  % weight obtained at 12 months 77.8% 89.7% 94.4% 95.8%
  % weight obtained, collapsed 82.7% (74.1, 91.3) 94.0% (90.1, 97.9) 11.3% (1.9, 20.7) 82.7%f (74.1, 91.3) 94.1%g (90.3, 97.9) 11.4%h (2.0, 20.8)
 GLOW Usual care Getting in balance Usual care Getting in balance
  Sample size, n 79 81 160 115 114 229 389 160 229 389
  % assessed at 32 weeks’ gestation 94.9% 87.7% 96.5% 93.9%
  % assessed at 6 months postpartum 96.2% 86.4% 96.5% 94.7%
  % assessed at 12 months postpartum 97.5% 85.2% 94.8% 94.7%
  % assessed, collapsed 94.4% (89.6, 97.4) 97.4% (94.4, 99.0) 3.0% (−1.0, 8.1) 91.9%f (87.1, 95.5) 95.6%g (92.9, 98.3) 3.7%h (−1.3, 8.7)
Attendance
 SHINE Active control Mindfulness Active control Mindfulness
  Sample size, n 41 44 85 53 56 109 194 85 109 194
  Total number of sessions 17 17 17 17
  Mean % of sessions attended 75.3% 71.5% 73.4% (68.2, 78.6) 77.9% 77.2% 77.5% (73.0, 82.1) 4.2% (−2.6, 11.0) 73.4%i (68.3, 78.5) 77.6%j (73.0, 82.1) 4.2%k (−2.7, 11.0)
  % attended 0% of sessions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (0.0, 0.2) 1.9% 0.0% 0.9% (0.0, 2.7) 0.9% (−0.9, 2.7) N/A N/A N/A
  % attended >80% of sessions 58.5% 52.2% 55.3% (44.7, 65.9) 66.0% 60.7% 63.3% (54.3, 72.4) 8.0% (−5.9, 21.9) 55.4%f (44.8, 66.0) 63.4%g (54.4, 72.4) 8.0%h (−5.9, 21.9)
 Get Social Traditional Get social Traditional Get social
  Sample size, n 36 39 75 71 71 142 217 75 142 217
  Total number of sessions 22 22 22 22
  Mean % of sessions attended 38.9% 69.0% 54.5% (46.0, 63.1) 56.7% 69.8% 63.2% (57.9, 68.5) 8.7% (−0.8, 18.2) 54.2%i (46.8, 61.6) 63.2%j (57.8, 68.6) 9.1%k (−0.1, 18.2)
  % attended 0% of sessions 33.3% 0.0% 16.0% (7.5, 24.5) 7.0% 2.8% 4.9% (1.3, 8.5) 11.1% (−20.3, −1.9) 14.6%f,l (7.1, 22.1) 4.5%g,l (0.6, 8.4) −10.1%h,l (−18.6, −1.6)
  % attended >80% of sessions 13.9% 48.7% 32.0% (21.2, 42.8) 26.8% 52.1% 39.4% (31.3, 47.6) 7.4% (−6.0, 20.9) 29.8%f (20.1, 39.5) 38.4%g (30.4, 46.4) 8.6%h (−4.0, 21.2)
 GLOW Usual care Getting in balance Usual care Getting in balance
  Sample size, n N/A 81 N/A 114 81 114 195 195
  Total number of sessions 13 13
  Mean % of sessions attended 82.2% 91.0% 8.8% (−0.03, 17.6) 82.2%i (76.0, 88.5) 91.0%j (85.7, 96.3) 8.8%k (0.6, 17.0)
  % attended N/A - - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
  0% of sessions
  % attended >80% of sessions 79.0% 88.6% 9.6% (−0.9, 21.0) 79.0%f (70.1, 87.9) 88.6%g (82.8, 94.4) 9.6%h (−1.0, 20.2)

Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).

a

Participants enrolled before prerequisite orientations were added to trial.

b

Participants enrolled after prerequisite orientations were added to trial.

c

Difference between before and after prerequisite orientations were added to trial, collapsed across trial conditions and assessment visits.

d

Unadjusted estimate for all participants enrolled before prerequisite orientations were added to trial, collapsed across trial conditions and assessment visits.

e

Unadjusted estimate for all participants enrolled after prerequisite orientations were added to trial, collapsed across trial condition and assessment visit.

f

Adjusted estimated proportion for all participants enrolled before prerequisite orientations were added to trial (multiplied by 100%) from logistic regression Model 2.

g

Adjusted estimated proportion for all participants enrolled after prerequisite orientations were added to trial (multiplied by 100%) from logistic regression Model 2.

h

Difference between adjusted estimated proportions before and after prerequisite orientations were added to trial, collapsed across trial condition and assessment visit.

i

Adjusted estimated proportion for all participants enrolled before prerequisite orientations were added to trial, from linear regression Model 2

j

Adjusted estimated proportion for all participants enrolled after prerequisite orientations were added to trial, from linear regression Model 2.

k

Difference between adjusted estimates before and after prerequisite orientations were added to trial, collapsed across trial condition and assessment visit, from linear regression Model 2.

l

Analyses comparing participants who attended 0% of sessions used simple Laplace smoothing (see Methods for details).

SHINE, Supporting Health by Integrating Nutrition and Exercise; GLOW, Gestational Weight Gain and Optimal Wellness.