Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR), substantially impacts the quality of life of diabetic patients, it remains, in developed countries, the leading cause of vision loss in working-age adults (20–65 years). Currently, about 90 million diabetics suffer from DR. DR is a silent complication that in its early stages is asymptomatic. However, over time, chronic hyperglycemia can lead to sensitive retinal damage, leading to fluid accumulation and retinal haemorrhage (HM), resulting in cloudy or blurred vision. It can, therefore, lead to severe visual impairment or even blindness if left untreated. It can be classified into nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). NPDR is featured with intraretinal microvasculature changes and can be further divided into mild, moderate, and severe stages that may associate with diabetic macular oedema (DME). PDR involves the formation and growth of new blood vessels (retinal neovascularisation) under low oxygen conditions. Early identification and treatment are key priorities for reducing the morbidity of diabetic eye disease. In the early stages of DR, a tight control of glycemia, blood pressure, plasma lipids, and regular monitoring can help prevent its progression to more advanced stages. In advanced stages, the main treatments of DR include intraocular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies, laser treatments, and vitrectomy. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the published literature pertaining to the latest progress in the treatment of DR.
Keywords: Antivascular endothelial growth factor, diabetic retinopathy, laser photocoagulation, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, vitrectomy
INTRODUCTION
Diabetic retinopathy (DR), substantially impacts the quality of life of diabetic patients, it remains, in developed countries, the leading cause of vision loss in working-age adults (20–65 years).[1,2] Currently, about 90 million diabetics suffer from DR, including 17 million diabetics with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), 21 million with diabetic macular edema (DME), and 28 million patients with DR that pose a serious threat to vision, and this prevalence of DR is expected to double by 2025 in the absence of better preventive therapeutic strategies.[2,3,4]
In almost all type 1 diabetics (T1D), the course of diabetes in the first two decades after the onset of diabetes can be complicated by DR, and about two-thirds of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) can also have some form of disease.[1] DR is a silent complication that, in its early stages is asymptomatic. However, over time, chronic hyperglycemia can lead to sensitive retinal damage, leading to fluid accumulation and retinal HMs, resulting in cloudy or blurred vision. It can, therefore, lead to severe visual impairment or even blindness if left untreated.[5] It can be classified into nonproliferative DR (NPDR) and PDR.[6,7] NPDR is featured with intraretinal microvasculature changes,[8] and can be further divided into mild, moderate, and severe stages that may associate with DME.[9] PDR involves the formation and growth of new blood vessels (retinal neovascularisation) under low oxygen conditions.[8] Thus, the fragility of the newly formed blood vessels without timely treatment can lead to vision loss. The presence of microaneurysms (MAs), soft/hard exudates (EXs), and haemorrhages (HMs) in the fundus image are pathognomonic signs of DR, as shown by several clinical studies.[10]
Early identification and treatment are the key priorities for reducing the morbidity of diabetic eye disease. Nevertheless, when appropriate treatments were applied, at least 90% of new cases of DR return to normal retinal structure, as well as normal functional restoration.[11] Although significant therapeutic progress has been made over the past decade and a variety of DR treatments are currently available, none of them are yet curative.[5] The need for an adequate screening programme for retinal surveillance for timely determination of the retinal condition and perhaps the level of damage has been reiterated. Moreover, new modalities of salvation treatment have arisen, and these have served as a source of hope even for patients with advanced DR, where it is calculated that 95% of them could continue with their vision once well treated before the retina is severely damaged.[12]
In the early stages of DR, a tight control of glycemia, blood pressure, plasma lipids and regular monitoring can help prevent its progression to more advanced stages. In advanced stages, the main treatments of DR include intraocular injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies, laser treatment, and vitrectomy.[13,14] In recent studies, the advantage of using these intraocular pharmacotherapies in treating the progression of PDR and DME has been shown, particularly applying anti-inflammatory (corticosteroids) and antiangiogenic agents (VEGF inhibitors).[15]
Although the results are encouraging, several adverse effects of the treatment were reported, and the treatment does not respond in some of the patients.[5]
The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the published literature pertaining to the treatment of DR.
PATHOGENESIS OF DIABETIC EYE DISEASE
Microangiopathy and capillary occlusion underlie the pathogenesis of DR, which is related to prolonged episodes of hyperglycemia.[16] Together, these lead to microvascular leakage and breakdown of the blood – the retinal barrier, resulting in retinal HM, EXs, and oedema, as well as the development of macular oedema. An increase in the level of VEGF is probably one of the major angiogenic factors implicated in the pathogenesis of DR.[17] In addition, some evidence clearly show that neurodegeneration is an early event in the pathogenesis of DR that could be linked to the development of microvascular abnormalities. The hallmarks of diabetes-induced neuroglial degeneration, which include reactive gliosis, diminished retinal neuronal function, and neural-cell apoptosis, have been observed to occur before overt microangiopathy in experimental models of DR and in the retina of diabetic donors.[18,19,20]
PARACLINICAL EXAMINATIONS OF DR
Optical coherence tomography
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an optical analogue of ultrasound imaging using low-coherence interferometry to give cross-sectional images of the retina. It makes it possible to quantify retinal thickening, confirm the diagnosis of macular edema and monitor it.[21]
Others paraclinical examinations of DR
They may also assist in the diagnosis of retinal lesions including biomicroscopy of the fundus with GOLDMAN 3 mirror and 90/78 dioptre lenses; retinography which in the form of photographs, makes it possible to obtain an image of the back of the eye or retina; fluorescein angiography is the baseline exam for the management of DR; Ultrasound of the posterior segment is indicated in case of intravitreous HM to detect detachment, tearing, or traction of the retina, or in case of the non-visible fundus.[22]
SYSTEMIC FACTOR CONTROL AND TREATMENT OF DR
DR treatment depends on its stage or type. It should be remembered that this complication can be classified as nonproliferative and proliferative or macula edema.
Nonproliferative (background) DR
The recommendation for mild to moderate NPDR is a screening programme well implemented for the control of blood glucose systemic levels via intensive insulin therapy that significantly reduces the risk for retinopathy prevalence and progression of the disease.[23] In addition to the systemic insulin therapy’s effect on glycemic and circulating insulin levels, it has been shown a local impact on ocular tissue as well, including restoration of retinal insulin receptor signalling cascade and rod photoreceptor function.[24,25]
Three large randomised clinical trials have demonstrated the beneficial effects of systemic blood glucose control on retinopathy. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial,[26] the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS),[27] and the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes (ACCORD) Eye Study Group,[27] all these studies have shown that tight glycemic control prevented the development of DR and decreased the progression of existing DR.
With regard to controlling blood pressure, high blood pressure is another well-known systemic risk factor for DR that may require specific management. Several studies[23] found that controlling blood pressure significantly reduced visual loss, leading to decreased progression of DR, and Candesartan has been shown to reduce the incidence of DR by 25% in T1D and 34% in T2D patients compared to Placebo. However, others studies showed that tight control of hypertension did not significantly reduce the incidence of DR.[21] Indeed, although there are contradictions about the advantage of antihypertensive therapy alone in the management of DR, the control of blood glucose combined with that of blood pressure has clearly shown its evidence by significantly delaying the onset and slowing the progression of DR.[28,29]
Serum lipid levels, specifically dyslipidemia and elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) have also gained recent attention for their potential impact on vision loss in diabetic patients. They have been shown to be significantly associated with retinal hard EX formation.[25] Many studies[28,30,31] have shown a correlation between triglyceride levels and diabetic eye disease, although its impact on retinopathy specifically is debated. Some studies have shown that Fenofibrate (200 mg/day) added to simvastatin therapy in T2D slowed down the progression of DR in 4 years.[27]
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Laser photocoagulation
Pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) for PDR was first proposed in the 1960s. It can be PRP or focal laser photocoagulation. PRP is a gold standard technology for treating very serious NPDR, PDR, and DME.[32] The strongest evidence comes from two related studies which show that early PRP therapy reduces the risk of high-risk proliferative DR compared with delayed treatment, although the incidence of severe vision loss is low in both the early and delayed treatment groups (2.6% vs. 3.7%).[33] Supplementing pharmacotherapy with laser therapy both as focal and grid application for macular oedema and as PRP application for proliferative disease may provide a more durable response, which have been demonstrated by some clinical trials.[34,35,36] PRP laser therapy has been identified as the primary treatment for PDR, but there are also noteworthy side effects, including deterioration of the original macular oedema, peripheral retinal function, and damage to night vision function.[37]
Subthreshold laser (STL) is a latest laser model, which involves the grid-like application of non-photocoagulation laser spots to “photostimulate” external retinal tissues, mainly the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), increasing the production of metabolites that inhibit neovascularisation and reduce the activity of vascular permeability or regulate the decrease in the production of mediators that increase vascular permeability and neovascularisation. In STLs, all benefits of continuous wave (CW) lasers can be achieved without adverse side effects. There are now several laser manufacturers supplying threshold laser systems such as the Micropulse laser™ (Iridex Corp.; Quantel Medical), Endpoint Management™ (Topcon), Microsecond Pulse (Navilas OD OS), and 2RT® (Ellex), they can all be applied to the fovea safely without visible damage.[38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57] Another innovation in retinal laser therapy is a photocoagulation system based on a back-of-the-eye camera integrated with retinal eye-tracking technology (NAVILAS). This technique allows the ophthalmologist to take an image of the retina of a patient with DR or DME, digitally surrounding the area requiring treatment, and have the device automatically deliver laser spots to the specified area.[58,59,60]
Recently, the PETER PAN study reported that retina visualisation technologies have also affected PDR treatment options and may have the potential to make targeted retinal photocoagulation a viable treatment option. This new technology, especially the Optos camera (Optos, Dunfermline, UK), allows a clinician to visualise the retina up to 200 internal degrees (sometimes without pupillary dilation), perform fluorescein angiography and autofluorescence to map STL burns on the retina. Targeted retinal photocoagulation could be used in conjunction with visible peripheral retinal ischaemia on Optos angiography. An optomap is a high-resolution ultra-widefield image of the retina, a high-definition photograph of eyes. Compared to traditional retinal imaging, Optos can capture up to 65% more of the retina. Optos devices are safe and may continue to become more prominent in the treatment of retinal lesions.[61]
With the emergence of new drugs that help effectively control macular oedema and retinal neovascularisation, the use of laser therapy for DR are diminishing. However, it still forms the mainstay of managing severe NPDR, PDR, and DME, because of the limited period of action of these new antiangiogenic agents.[62]
Anti-VEGF agents for PDR
VEGF is known for its important role in the genesis of DR.[63] Currently, the anti-VEGF molecules whose role in the management of DR is being studied are pegaptanib (Macugen), ranibizumab (Lucentis), bevacizumab (Avastin), and aflibercept intravitreal (Eylea). Among these anti-VEGF agents available, bevacizumab, in addition to being the most economical, has also shown good results when currently used as an off-label drug.[62]
Several studies found that intravitreal bevacizumab is also beneficial in PDR patients, although a study suggests that the procedure may increase the risk of traction retinal detachment (TRD) in fibrous eye growth. A prospective study assessed 40 eyes with PDR and found that the visual acuity (VA) of the eyes treated with PRP alone deteriorated significantly over a 3-month period (P = 0.041), while the VA of the eye receiving PRP combined with bevacizumab underwent no significant changes in VA. Bevacizumab has also been shown to be effective in PDR patients with vitreous haemorrhage (VH). Most patients with retinal neovascularization (NV) who received the drug showed abating at week 36. The results of other studies seem to suggest that taking bevacizumab a few days before surgery may have a substantial advantage in PDR patients. Whether physicians decide to use PRP or anti-VEGF therapy in PDR may depend on the presence or nonexistence of DME. In the presence of DME, anti-VEGF therapy may be preferable because it can treat both DME and PDR, provided that the patient receives monthly injections. In addition, care needs to be taken when using anti-VEGF drugs in patients with apparent fibrovascular membranes, as these drugs may aggravate TRD.[64,65,66]
Results from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR) S Protocol S trial concluded that ranibizumab treatment for RDP also offered several advantages over PRP for 2 years. It is an effective alternative to PRP for PDR treatment. The ranibizumab group showed superior gain in VA over the course of 2 years, decreased peripheral visual field loss, and few vitrectomies. In addition, ranibizumab-treated eyes were less likely to develop central-involved DME causing vision impairment of 20/32 or worse. With good therapeutic adherence, applying the anti-VEGF treatment algorithm DRCR.net for PDR can provide excellent clinical results for 2 years.[67]
The protocol AB randomised clinical trial is a surgical study evaluating rapid vitrectomy versus anti-VEGF therapy for VH due to PDR. This clinical trial was designed to compare these two initial treatment options. PDR patients with VH who received monthly 2 mg aflibercept intravitreal injections were compared to similar patients who had pars plana vitrectomy with PRP within 2 weeks of randomisation. This study has concluded that both aflibercept and vitrectomy with PRP are viable first-line options for the treatment of VH from PDR.[68]
Vitrectomy for PDR
At present, vitrectomies still play a key role in some treatments for DR.[36] It is an important means for the treatment of long-standing VH, tractional retinal detachment, and combined tractional and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study has shown a benefit of earlier surgery in patients with T1D and in those with active neovascularisation.[11,26]
Over the past 40 years, many reports have clearly demonstrated the beneficial effects of vitrectomy in these cases. To date, however, there is no clear study to support this conclusion. Most studies have shown benefits in using preoperative anti-VEGF therapy to reduce the likelihood of intraoperative and postoperative HMs. In addition, reduced surgical time and improved postoperative VA trends have been confirmed in smaller case series. In addition, DR and DME vitrectomy are widely used in low-insured patients in areas of the world with limited economic resources, even in relatively affluent countries.[36] In a prospective, randomised, controlled study (Diabetic Retinopathic Vitrectomy Study, DRVS), the benefits of vitrectomy were confirmed and the optimal point in time was determined. Patients who underwent an early vitrectomy had significantly better vision than those who underwent surgery a year later.[69]
Corticosteroids for DR
The majority of studies involving corticosteroid therapy in DR has been predominantly focused on the effect of triamcinolone acetonide, dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide in the treatment of DR.[70,71,72] Considering that chronic inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of DR, for this purpose, several new therapeutic targets have been identified for this disease targeting the liberating processes of cytokines and chemokines. The new therapeutic targets are the direct and indirect antagonism of interleukins, proteases, chemokines, tumour necrosis factor (TNF), angiopoietin-2, and kallikrein. Another compound involved in many systemic inflammatory diseases as well as DR is TNF. Angiopoietin-2 is another effective mediator of increased vascular permeability in DR. Corticosteroids are effective anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic agents, which support the rationale for their use in the management of PDR. Side effects have been reported, namely, cataract formation, glaucoma, and infection.[63]
The corticosteroid drugs can be administered through topical route generally employed in the form of eye drops, systemic delivery via oral or intravenous routes, periocular delivery or transscleral delivery includes subconjunctival, subtenon, retrobulbar, peribulbar and posterior juxtascleral injections, which are less invasive than intraocular routes and intraocular delivery includes the intravitreal and suprachoroidal routes.[73]
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR) and other clinical studies evaluated the role of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as adjunctive treatment to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for patients with PDR and DME in two different studies and have demonstrated the effectiveness of combination in preventing exacerbations of macular oedema with improvement in VA and macular thickness in patients having PDR and DME.[74,75,76,77,78] The DRCR first study compared two doses of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as monotherapy to focal/grid laser photocoagulation in 840 eyes with DME. The study has demonstrated that the 4 mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide group had better VA at 4 months; however, at 16 months, two years and three years, the laser group had better VA than either intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide groups. The laser group had fewer incidences of glaucoma and cataract.[79,80,81]
The second randomised controlled trial by the DRCR network compared focal/grid laser alone to 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone plus laser. Two additional arms utilised intravitreal ranibizumab. Similar to the previous study, the triamcinolone plus laser showed superiority compared to laser alone in terms of VA at 24 weeks follow-up. However, at 1 and 2 years, the treatments appeared equivalent in terms of VA outcome, but with increased rates of cataract and elevated intraocular pressure in the triamcinolone plus laser group. In the subgroup analysis of patients who were pseudophakic at baseline, the triamcinolone plus laser group appeared superior to the laser alone treatment and equivalent to the treatment arms using ranibizumab.[82,83]
Gillies et al.,[84] in another study reported the 2 years results of a randomised controlled trial of intravitreal triamcinolone plus laser versus laser treatment only for DME which showed that treatment with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide plus macular laser resulted in a doubling of improvement in vision compared with laser only over 2 years in eyes with DME, but associated with cataract and raised intraocular pressure.
However, another study showed no beneficial effect of combined intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide plus PRP and macular photocoagulation in coexisting high-risk PDR and DME in terms of VA and macular thickness compared with standard treatment.[85]
Beneficial effects of higher doses of aspirin (990 mg) in patients with early DR have been reported by the dipyridamole aspirin microangiopathy of diabetes (DAMAD) study, in contrast to the poor results obtained in advanced DR patients using 650 mg of aspirin, reported by the DR early treatment study (ETDRS). A prospective study made in 2020 showed the beneficial effects of sulindac on DR development and progression. More recently, preclinical studies with specific cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors have shown beneficial effects translated in reduced vascular leakage, capillary cell apoptosis, and vessel degeneration. The topical administration of a COX-2 inhibitor in preclinical studies has been found to reduce DR symptoms similarly to systemic administration. While clinical use, when administered systemically, is discouraged due to the increased risk of heart attack and stroke.[86,87]
Others drugs
Some drugs often used for other pathologies have been tested as an anti-inflammatory against DR. Preclinical studies showed that oxides of nitrogen (NOX) blockers were able to reduce vascular leakage and neovascularisation, as well as oxidative stress and inflammation, by inhibiting nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) activation and the production of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2).[88,89,90] Second-line oral antidiabetic drug dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (also known as gliptins) have shown anti-inflammatory properties and prevent blood retinal-barrier (BRB) breakdown in preclinical models of diabetes.[5,46] In addition to inhibitors (DPP-4), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), have also proven similar benefits in experimental models, including protection against inflammation secondary to hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, BRB breakdown, angiogenesis and, neurodegeneration, being at least in part mediated by the AKT pathway.[91,92,93] Liraglutide, which is a GLP1RA, has also shown vasoprotective effects, as described in a recent study in diabetic rats.[50] Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAD (P) H) oxidase (NOX) inhibitors, including diphenyleneiodonium and apocynin, have demonstrated preventive effects against DR progression, which may be due to decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and VEGF levels, although independent NOX effects have also been reported.[51] Recently, several studies have focused on the possibility that nutraceutical agents may complement pharmacological therapy with the aim of preventing or delaying the evolution of DR. Some natural molecules, including a variety of polyphenols (resveratrol, curcumin, quercetin, pterostilbene, epicatechin, epigallocatechin gallate, etc.) and anthocyanins, sesamine (a lignan isolated from sesame seeds and sesame oil), bromelain (a cysteine protease found in pineapple juice and stems), as well as alpha-lipoic acid (a vitamin-like chemical present in liver, kidney, and some vegetables), and lutein (a carotenoid present in green vegetables), etc., Strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, including their ability to protect against hypoxia and angiogenesis, have been highlighted by several recent reviews. These properties have been associated with interference with adhesion, angiogenesis, and inflammation molecules/mediators such as intercellular adhesion molecule 1(ICAM-1), VEGF, and tumour necrosis factor a (TNF-a) and signalling namely via NF-kB, nuclear factor erythroid-related factor 2- Kelch-like ECH associating protein 1(NRF2-Keap1), and toll-like receptors (TLRs).[94,95,96,97,98,99] These molecules could be an attractive nutraceutical alternative to pharmacological approaches. Intravitreal administration of mesenchymal stem cell-derived (MSC-derived) exosomes is able to reduce retinal ischaemia and neovascularisation in a murine model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR),[100] and reduce apoptosis and inflammatory responses through the reduction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in the retina of a mouse model of retinal laser injury.[101] MSC-derived EVs also show protective properties against DR in the retina of STZ-induced diabetic animals, being able to prevent retinal degeneration by increasing miRNA-222 expression,[102] and to reduce hyperglycemia-induced retinal inflammation, decreasing the levels of inflammatory markers, namely IL-1b, IL-18, and caspase-1 through miR-126 overexpression.[103] However, not only mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-derived EVs) present protective effects. Exosomes from retinal astrocyte cells were able to prevent retinal vessel leakage and inhibit neovascularisation in a laser-induced choroidal neovascularisation model, which have been shown by Hajrasouliha et al. These initial findings encourage further research and the development of novel EVs-based therapies for the treatment of DR.[104,105,106,107,108]
CONCLUSIONS
A multidisciplinary approach can help significantly reduce the risk for vision loss from diabetes and associated eye diseases, such as DR. Primary prevention of DR and its progression through control of risk factors such as hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia are probably the prime aim of all clinicians. Current pharmacotherapies, particularly anti-VEGF agents and corticosteroids, now form the mainstay of treatment in the majority of cases where they serve as an important adjunct to laser. Since these need to be used via an intravitreal route, certain risks are involved and research is focusing on drugs which may be administered orally. Various agents such as aspirin, vitamin E, vitamin C, aldose reductase inhibitors, and protein kinase C inhibitors, which were expected to be promising theoretically, have not shown adequate outcomes. More clinical research is needed to complement the preclinical evidences for the use of nutraceuticals as an alternative to pharmacological approaches. The surgical outcome after diabetic vitrectomy has continued to steadily improve with advances in vitreoretinal surgical instrumentation and technique. The indications, efficacy, and safety of latest medical and surgical treatments, however, require further evaluation. One thing that is now certain is that in view of the multiple and complex pathways involved in the formation of DR, no single standard treatment strategy is sufficient and multiple modes of treatment are needed as a part of the algorithm for DR management.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Fong DS, Aiello AP, Ferris FL, Klein R. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2540–53. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Candrilli SD, Davis KL, Kan HJ, Lucero MA, Rousculp MD. Prevalence and the associated burden of illness of symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2007;21:306–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Safi SZ, Qvist R, Kumar S, Batumalaie K, Ismail IS. Molecular mechanisms of diabetic retinopathy, general preventive strategies, and novel therapeutic targets. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:801269. doi: 10.1155/2014/801269. doi:10.1155/2014/801269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, Kowalski JW, Bek T, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(3):556–564. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martins B, Amorim M, Reis F, Ambrósio AF, Fernandes R. Extracellular vesicles and microrna:Putative role in diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Antioxidants. 2020;9:1–26. doi: 10.3390/antiox9080705. doi:10.3390/antiox9080705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shah CA. Diabetic retinopathy:A comprehensive review. Indian J Med Sci. 2008;62:500–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang W, Liu H, Al-Shabrawey M, Caldwell RW, Caldwell RB. Inflammation and diabetic retinal microvascular complications. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2011;2:96–103. doi: 10.4103/0975-3583.83035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Frank RN. Diabetic retinopathy and systemic factors. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22:151–6. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.154388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Burditt G, Caird FI, Drape GJ. r. The natural history of diabetic retinopathy. QJM Int J Med. 1968;37:303–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.QureshiI Ma J, Abbas Q. Recent development on detection methods for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Symmetry. 2019;11:1–34. doi:10.3390/sym11060749. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lu L, Jiang Y, Jaganathan R, Hao Y. Current advances in pharmacotherapy and technology for diabetic retinopathy:A systematic review. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2018/1694187. doi:10.1155/2018/1694187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Calderon GD, Juarez OH, Hernandez GE, Punzo SM, De La Cruz ZD. Oxidative stress and diabetic retinopathy:Development and treatment. Eye (Basingstoke) 2017;31:1122–30. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rodriguez ML, Perez S, Mena-Molla S, Desco MC, Ortega AL. Oxidative stress and microvascular alterations in diabetic retinopathy:Future therapies. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:4940825. doi: 10.1155/2019/4940825. doi:10.1155/2019/4940825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tarr JM, Kaul K, Chopra M, Kohner EM, Chibber R. Pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy. ISRN Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:343560. doi: 10.1155/2013/343560. doi:10.1155/2013/343560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kumar B, Gupta SK, Saxena R, Srivastava S. Current trends in the pharmacotherapy ofdiabetic retinopathy. J Postgr Med. 2012;58:132–9. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.97176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brownlee M. Banting Lecture 2004. The pathobiology of diabetic complications. A unifying mechanism. Diabetes. 2005;54:1615–25. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nguyen QD, Tatlipinar S, Shah SM, Haller JA, Quinlan E, Sung J, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a critical stimulus for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:961–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barber AJ, Lieth E, Khin SA, Antonetti DA, Buchanan AG, Gardner TW. Neural apoptosis in the retina during experimental and human diabetes. Early onset and effect of insulin. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:783–91. doi: 10.1172/JCI2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carrasco E, Hernández C, Miralles A, Huguet P, Farrés J, SimóR Lower somatostatin expression is an early event in diabetic retinopathy and is associated with retinal neurodegeneration. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2902–8. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garcia-Ramírez M, Hernández C, Villarroel M, Canals F, Alonso MA, Fortuny R, et al. Interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) is downregulated at early stages of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia. 2009;52:2633–41. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1548-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178–81. doi: 10.1126/science.1957169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bhende M, Shetty S, Parthasarathy MK, Ramya S. Optical coherence tomography:A guide to interpretation of common macular diseases. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66:20–35. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_902_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhu CH, Zhang SS, Kong Y, Bi YF, Wang L, Zhang Q, et al. Effects of intensive control of blood glucose and blood pressure on microvascular complications in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6:141–5. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.02.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reiter CE, Wu X, Sandirasegarane L, Nakamura M, Gilbert KA, Singh RS, et al. Diabetes reduces basal retinal insulin receptor signaling:Reversal with systemic and local insulin. Diabetes. 2006;55:1148–56. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-0744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Holfort SK, Norgaard K, Jackson GR, Hommel E, Madsbad S, Munch IC, et al. Retinal function in relation to improved glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2011;54:1853–61. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2149-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Das A, Stroud S, Mehta A, Rangasamy S. New treatments for diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;17:219–30. doi: 10.1111/dom.12384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.The ACCORD, Study Group ACCORD, Eye Study Group. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:233–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marozas LM, Fort PE. Diabetic retinopathy —update on prevention techniques, present therapies, and new leads. US Ophthalmic Rev. 2014;7:54–8. doi: 10.17925/usor.2014.07.01.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.ACCORD Study Group, ACCORD Eye Study Group. Chew EY, Ambrosius WT, Davis MD, Danis RP, et al. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:233–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang Y, Wang JY, Ying GS, Shen LP, Zhang Z. Serum lipids and other risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14:392–9. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1200237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Benarous R, Sasongko MB, Qureshi S, Fenwick E, Dirani M, Wong TY, et al. Differential association of serum lipids with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7464–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mohamed Q, Gillies MC, Wong TY. Management of diabetic retinopathy:A systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:902–16. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.8.902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Berger A, Sheidow T, Cruess AF, Arbour JD, Courseau AS, de Takacsy F. Efficacy/safety of ranibizumab monotherapy or with laser versus laser monotherapy in DME. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50:209–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen G, Li W, Tzekov R, Jiang F, Mao S, Tong Y. Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115797. doi:10.1371/journal. pone. 0115797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ishibashi T, Li X, Koh A, Lai TY, Lee FL, Lee WK, et al. The REVEAL study:Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy in Asian patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1402–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mansour SE, Browning DJ, Wong K, Flynn HW, Bhavsar AR. The evolving treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:653–78. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S236637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stewart MW. Treatment of diabetic retinopathy:Recent advances and unresolved challenges. World J Diabetes. 2016;7:333. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i16.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Friberg TR. Subthreshold (invisible) modified grid diode laser photocoagulation and diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME) Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Akduman L, Olk RJ. Subthreshold (invisible) modified grid diode laser photocoagulation in diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME) Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:706–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Friberg TR. Infrared micropulsed laser treatment for diabetic macular edema–subthreshold versus threshold lesions. Semin Ophthalmol. 2001;16:19–24. doi: 10.1076/soph.16.1.19.4217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Laursen ML, Moeller F, Sander B, Sjoelie AK. Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1173–9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.040949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dorin G. Subthreshold and micropulse diode laser photocoagulation. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003;18:147–53. doi: 10.1076/soph.18.3.147.29812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Luttrull JK, Musch DC, Mainster MA. Subthreshold diode micropulse photocoagulation for the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:74–80. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.051540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kregel KC. Heat shock proteins:Modifying factors in physiological stress responses and acquired thermotolerance. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92:2177–86. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01267.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Iwami H, Pruessner J, Shiraki K, Brinkmann R, Miura Y. Protective effect of a laser-induced sub-lethal temperature rise on RPE cells from oxidative stress. Exp Eye Res. 2014;124:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sivaprasad S, Sandhu R, Tandon A, Sayed-Ahmed K, McHugh DA, et al. Subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema:A three-year follow up. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007;35:640–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Miura Y, Treumer F, Klettner A, Hillenkamp J, Brinkmann R, Birngruber R, et al. VEGF and PEDF secretions over time following various laser irradiations on an RPE organ culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:469. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sramek C, Mackanos M, Spitler R, Leung LS, Nomoto H, Contag CH, et al. Non-damaging retinal phototherapy:Dynamic range of heat shock protein expression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1780–7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kumar V, Ghosh B, Raina UK, Goel N. Subthreshold diode micropulse panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Eye. 2009;23:2122–23. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sivaprasad S, Dorin G. Subthreshold diode laser micropulse photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012;9:189–97. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Luttrull JK, Dorin G. Subthreshold diode micropulse laser photocoagulation (SDM) as invisible retinal phototherapy for diabetic macular edema:A review. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2012;8:274–84. doi: 10.2174/157339912800840523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Parodi MB, Iacono P, Bandello F. Subthreshold grid laser versus intravitreal bevacizumab as second-line therapy for macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion recurring after conventional grid laser treatment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253:1647–51. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2845-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vujosevic S, Martini F, Convento E, Longhin E, Kotsafti O, Parrozzani R, et al. Subthreshold laser therapy for diabetic macular edema:Metabolic and safety issues. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20:3267–71. doi: 10.2174/09298673113209990030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Luttrull JK, Sinclair SH. Safety of transfoveal subthreshold diode micropulse laser for fovea-involving diabetic macular edema in eyes with good visual acuity. Retina. 2014;34:2010–20. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lavinsky D, Cardillo JA, Melo LASr, Dare A, Farah ME, Belfort R, Jr, et al. Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4314–23. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Moutray T, Evans JR, Lois N, Armstrong DJ, Peto T, Azuara-Blanco A. Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3:CD012314. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012314.pub2. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012314.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lavinsky D, Sramek C, Wang J, Huie P, Dalal R, Mandel Y, et al. Subvisible retinal laser therapy:Titration algorithm and tissue response. Retina. 2014;34:87–97. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182993edc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kernt M, Cheuteu RE, Cserhati S, Seidensticker F, Liegl RG, Lang J, et al. Pain and accuracy of focal laser treatment for diabetic macular edema using a retinal navigated laser (Navilas) Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:289–96. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S27859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kozak I, Oster SF, Cortes MA, Dowell D, Hartmann K, Kim JS, et al. Clinical evaluation and treatment accuracy in diabetic macular edema using navigated laser photocoagulator NAVILAS. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1119–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kozak I, Kim JS, Oster SF, Chhablani J, Freeman WR. Focal navigated laser photocoagulation in retinovascular disease:Clinical results in initial case series. Retina. 2012;32:930–5. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318227ab5b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Muqit MM, Young LB, McKenzie R, John B, Marcellino GR, Henson DB, et al. Pilot randomised clinical trial of Pascal TargETEd retinal versus variable fluence PANretinal 20 ms laser in diabetic retinopathy:PETER PAN study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:220–7. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Saxena R, Singh D, Saklani R, Gupta SK. Clinical biomarkers and molecular basis for optimized treatment of diabetic retinopathy:Current status and future prospects. Eye Brain. 2016;8:1–13. doi: 10.2147/EB.S69185. doi:10.2147/EB.S69185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Simó R, Hernández C. Advances in the medical treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1556–62. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Waisbourd M, Goldstein M, Loewenstein A. Treatment of diabetic retinopathy with anti-VEGF drugs. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2011;89:203–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Duh EJ, Sun JK, Stitt AW. Diabetic retinopathy:Current understanding, mechanisms, and treatment strategies. JCI Insight. 2017;2 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.93751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Das A, McGuire P, Monickaraj F. Novel pharmacotherapies in diabetic retinopathy:Current status and what's in the horizon? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016;64:4–13. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.178154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sun JK, Glassman AR, Beaulieu WT, Stockdale CR, Bressler NM, Flaxel C, et al. Rationale and application of the protocol S anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Antoszyk AN. Primary results for protocol AB. Presented at:American Academy of Ophthalmology annual meeting. 2021 Nov 12-15; New Orleans. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kollias AN, Ulbig MW. Diabetic retinopathy:Early diagnosis and effective treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Feb;107(5):75–83. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0075. quiz 84. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Nauck M, Roth M, Tamm M, Eickelberg O, Wieland H, Stulz P, et al. Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor by plateletactivating factor and platelet-derived growth factor is downregulated by corticosteroids. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1997;16:398–406. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.16.4.9115750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tamura H, Miyamoto K, Kiryu J, Miyahar SA, Katsuta H, Hirose F, et al. Intravitreal injection of corticosteroid attenuates leukostasis and vascular leakage in experimental diabetic retina, Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1440–4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Moisseiev E, Loewenstein A. Corticosteroid Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy. In Current Management of Diabetic Retinopathy Elsevier. 2018:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-48452-7.00008-1. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Silva M, Peng T, Zhao X, Li S, Farhan M, Zheng W. Recent trends in drug-delivery systems for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy and associated fibrosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;173:439–60. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zein WM, Noureddin BN, Jurdi FA, Schakal A, Bashshur ZF. Panretinal photocoagulation and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with macular edema. Retina. 2006;26:137–42. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200602000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bandello F, Polito A, Pognuz DR, Monaco P, Dimastrogiovanni A, Paissios J. Triamcinolone as adjunctive treatment to laser panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:643–50. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.5.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zacks DN, Johnson MW. Combined intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide and panretinal photocoagulation for concomitant diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 2005;25:135–40. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200502000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bandello F, Pognuz DR, Pirracchio A, Polito A. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for florid proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:1024–7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-004-0911-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Maia OO, Takahashi BS, Costa RA, Scott IU, Takahashi WY. Combined laser and intravitreal triamcinolone for proliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema:One-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:291–7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Maia OO, Jr, Takahashi BS, Costa RA, Scott IU, Takahashi WY. A randomized trial comparing intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1447–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ip MS, Bressler SB, Antoszyk AN, Flaxel CJ, Kim JE, Friedman SM, et al. A randomized trial comparing intravitreal triamcinolone and focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema:Baseline features. Retina. 2008;28:919–30. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818144a7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Beck RW, Edwards AR, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, Ferris F, Glassman AR, et al. Three-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing focal/grid photocoagulation and intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:245–51. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Elman MJ, Aiello LP, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Edwards AR, et al. Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1064–77.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Elman MJ, Bressler NM, Qin H, Beck RW, Ferris FL, Friedman SM, et al. Expanded 2-year follow-up of ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:609–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Gillies MC, McAllister IL, Zhu M, Wong W, Louis D, Arnold JJ, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone prior to laser treatment of diabetic macular edema:24-month results of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:866–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mirshahi A, Shenazandi H, Lashay A, Faghihi H, Alimahmoudi A, Dianat S. Intravitreal triamcinolone as an adjunct to standard laser therapy in coexisting high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy and clinically significant macular edema. Retina. 2010;30:254–9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181b4f125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Amrite AC, Ayalasomayajula SP, Cheruvu NP, Kompella UB. Single periocular injection of celecoxib-PLGA microparticles inhibits diabetes-induced elevations in retinal PGE2, VEGF, and vascular leakage. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1149–60. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kern TS, Miller CM, Du Y, Zheng L, Mohr S, Ball SL, et al. Topical administration of nepafenac inhibits diabetes-induced retinal microvascular disease and underlying abnormalities of retinal metabolism and physiology. Diabetes. 2007;56:373–9. doi: 10.2337/db05-1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Al-Shabrawey M, Rojas M, Sanders T, Behzadian A, El-Remessy A, Bartoli M, et al. Role of NADPH oxidase in retinal vascular inflammation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3239–44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhang W, Rojas M, Lilly B, Tsai NT, Lemtalsi T, Liou GI, et al. NAD (P) H oxidase-dependent regulation of CCL2 production during retinal inflammation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3033–40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kowluru RA, Koppolu P, Chakrabarti S, Chen S. Diabetes-induced activation of nuclear transcriptional factor in the retina, and its inhibition by antioxidants. Free Radic Res. 2003;37:1169–80. doi: 10.1080/10715760310001604189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Goncalves A, Marques C, Leal E, Ribeiro CF, Reis F, Ambrosio AF, Fernandes R. Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibition prevents blood-retinal barrier breakdown, inflammation and neuronal cell death in the retina of type 1 diabetic rats. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1842:1454–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Goncalves A, Almeida L, Silva AP, Fontes-Ribeiro C, Ambrosio AF, Cristovao A, et al. The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor sitagliptin ameliorates retinal endothelial cell dysfunction triggered by inflammation. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;102:833–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Goncalves A, Leal E, Paiva A, Teixeira Lemos E, Teixeira F, Ribeiro CF, et al. Protective effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor sitagliptin in the blood-retinal barrier in a type 2 diabetes animal model. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2012;14:454–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hernandez C, Bogdanov P, Corraliza L, Garcia-Ramirez M, Sola-Adell C, Arranz JA, et al. Topical administration of GLP-1 receptor agonists prevents retinal neurodegeneration in experimental diabetes. Diabetes. 2016;65:172–87. doi: 10.2337/db15-0443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Zhang Q, Xiao X, Zheng J, Li M. A glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, liraglutide, ameliorates endothelial dysfunction through miRNAs to inhibit apoptosis in rats. Peer J. 2019;7:e6567. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Peng JJ, Xiong SQ, Ding LX, Peng J, Xia XB. Diabetic retinopathy:Focus on NADPH oxidase and its potential as therapeutic target. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;853:381–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.04.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wang W, Lo ACY. Diabetic retinopathy:Pathophysiology and treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1816. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061816. doi:10.3390/ijms19061816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Semeraro F, Morescalchi F, Cancarini A, Russo A, Rezzola S, Costagliola C. Diabetic retinopathy, a vascular and inflammatory disease:Therapeutic implications. Diabetes Metab. 2019;45:517–27. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Rossino MG, Casini G. Nutraceuticals for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Nutrients. 2019;11:771. doi: 10.3390/nu11040771. doi:10.3390/nu11040771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Moisseiev E, Anderson JD, Oltjen S, Goswami M, Zawadzki RJ, Nolta JA, et al. Protective effect of intravitreal administration of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells on retinal ischemia. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42:1358–67. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1319491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Yu B, Shao H, Su C, Jiang Y, Chen X, Bai L, et al. Exosomes derived from MSCs ameliorate retinal laser injury partially by inhibition of MCP-1. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34562. doi: 10.1038/srep34562. doi:10.1038/srep34562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Safwat A, Sabry D, Ragiae A, Amer E, Mahmoud RH, Shamardan RM. Adipose mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes attenuate retina degeneration of streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rabbits. J Circ Biomark. 2018;7 doi: 10.1177/1849454418807827. doi:10.1177/1849454418807827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zhang W, Wang Y, Kong Y. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells modulate miR-126 to ameliorate hyperglycemia-induced retinal inflammation via targeting HMGB1. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:294–303. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hajrasouliha AR, Jiang G, Lu Q, Lu H, Kaplan HJ, Zhang HG, Shao H. Exosomes from retinal astrocytes contain antiangiogenic components that inhibit laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:28058–67. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.470765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Wiley LA, Burnight ER, DeLuca AP, Anfinson KR, Cranston CM, Kaalberg EE, et al. cGMP production of patient-specific iPSCs and photoreceptor precursor cells to treat retinal degenerative blindness. Sci Rep. 2006;6:30742. doi: 10.1038/srep30742. doi:10.1038/srep30742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Khademhosseini A, Ferreira L, Blumling J, 3rd, Yeh J, Karp JM, Fukuda J, et al. Co-culture of human embryonic stem cells with murine embryonic fibroblasts on microwell-patterned substrates. Biomaterials. 2006;27:5968–77. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Baker PS, Brown GC. Stem-cell therapy in retinal disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:175–81. doi: 10.1097/icu.0b013e328329b5f2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Nguyen HV, Li Y, Tsang SH. Patient-specific iPSC-derived RPE for modeling of retinal diseases. J Clin Med. 2015;4:567–78. doi: 10.3390/jcm4040567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]