Table 1.

Descriptive Information for Included Studies.

Article	Samplea	Instrumentb	Sample size	Time frame	# Criteria
Casey et al. (2012); Lane and Sher (2015)c	NESARC Wave 2	AUDADIS-IV	22,177g	Current	11
Dawson et al. (2010) d	NESARC Wave 1	AUDADIS-IV	26,946g	Current	11
Saha et al. (2006) d	NESARC Wave 1	AUDADIS-IV	22,526h	Current	10
Saha et al. (2007) d	NESARC Wave 1	AUDADIS-IV	20,846i	Current	11
Shmulewitz et al. (2010) d	Israeli households	AUDADIS-IV	1,066	Current	11
			1,160	Lifetime	11
Keyes et al. (2011)	NLAES	AUDADIS-IV	18,352i	Current	l2
Preuss et al. (2014)	WHO/ISBRA	AUDADIS-based	711	Lifetime	11
	Australia		104
	Brazil		212
	Canada		227
	Finland		86
	Japan		82
Mewton et al. (2011a); Proudfoot et al. (2006)	NSMHWB	CIDI V2.0	7,746	Current	11
Mewton et al. (2011b)	NSMHWB	CIDI V2.0	853j	Current	11
McCutcheon et al. (2011)	COGA	SSAGA	8,605	Lifetime	9
	Non-DUI Men		3,056
	Non-DUI Women		3,894
	DUI Men		1,330
	DUI Women		325
Beseler et al. (2010)	College students	Survey-specific	353	Current	10o
Hagman (2017) c	College Students	Brief DSM-5 AUD Assessment	923g	Current	11
Hagman and Cohn (2011)	College students	CIDI-SAM	396	Current	11
Ehlke et al. (2012)	NSDUH 2009	SAMHSA	4,605k	Current	11
Kuerbis et al. (2013b)	NSDUH 2009	SAMHSA	3,412l	Current	11
Hagman and Cohn (2013)	NSDUH 2009	SAMHSA	3,806m	Current	11p
Rose et al. (2012)	NSDUH 2002-2008	SAMHSA	9,356n	Current	11
Harford et al. (2009)	NSDUH 2002-2005	SAMHSA	133,231	Current	11
	Men, Age 12-17 years		11,651
	Men, Age 18-25 years		27,377
	Men, Age 26+ years		25,872
	Women, Age 12-17 years		l2,304
	Women, Age 18-25 years		29,331
	Women, Age 26+ years		26,696
Srisurapanont et al. (2012)	Thai-NMH Survey	MINI-Thai	3,718	Current	7
	Men		3,174
	Women		544
	Adolescents		272
	Adults		3,446
Duncan et al. (2011)	MOAFTS	SSAGA	2,835	Lifetime	11
	Women, Age 18-20		1,158
	Women, Age 21-25		1,677
Derringer et al. (2013)	MTFS & SAGE	SSAGA	6,597	Lifetime	7
Gilder et al. (2011) e	American Indians	SSAGA	530	Lifetime	10
Gelhorn et al. (2008)	Mixed Adolescentsf	CIDI-SAM	5,587	Lifetime	11
Caetano et al. (2016) c	Puerto Rican adults	CIDI-Spanish	1,107g	Lifetime	11
Castaldelli-Maia et al. (2015) c	Brazilian adults	CIDI-Portuguese	936i	Current	11
Bond et al. (2012); Borges et al., 2010, 2011); Cherpitel et al. (2010)	ED patients	CIDI V1.0	3,191	Current	12
	Argentina		662
	Mexico		547
	Poland		1,098
	USA		884
Hasin et al. (2012) d	Clinical	PRISM	543	Current	11
Langenbucher et al. (2004)	Clinical	CIDI-SAM	372	Lifetime	9
Wu et al. (2009)	Clinical	DSM-IV checklist	462	Current	7
Wu et al. (2012)	Clinical	DSM-IV checklist	671	Current	7
Martin et al. (2006)	Clinical adolescents	SCID	464	Lifetime	11
Edwards et al. (2013)	VATSPSUD	SCID	7,454	Lifetime	11
Kuerbis et al. (2013a)	SARD	SCID	461	Lifetime	11

^aNESARC = National Epidemiological Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions; NLAES = National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Study; WHO/ISBRA = World Health Organization/International Society on Biomedical Research Collaborative Study; NSMHWB = National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being (Australia); COGA = Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism; NSDUH = National Survey on Drug Use and Health; Thai-NMH Survey = Thai National Mental Health Survey; MOAFTS = Missouri Adolescent Female Twin Study; MTFS = Minnesota Twin Family Study; SAGE = Study of Addiction: Genes and Environment; ED = Emergency Department, VATSPSUD = Virginia Adult Twin Study of Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders; SARD = Substance Abuse Research Demonstration.

^bAUDADIS-IV = Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV; CIDI = Composite International Diagnostic Interview; SSAGA = Semistructured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism; SAMHSA = Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; SAM = Substance Abuse Module; MINI-Thai = Mini International Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Thai module; PRISM = Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders; SCID = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV.

^cAdditional studies included in the updated analysis.

^dWe could not confirm the reported metric for the item response theory (IRT) parameters with the authors, but based on the description and software used an IRT parameterization seemed likely. Differential item functioning analysis estimates could also not be acquired, so the aggregate results were used.

^eWe selected the authors’ “once per month” binge drinking criteria for comparison of the IRT thresholds. Using the other criteria resulted in trivially different associations.

^fCombination of community, adjudicated, and clinical individuals.

^gPast year drinkers.

^h≥ 12 Drinks in past year and ever drank 5+ drinks on ≥ 1 occasion.

ⁱ≥ 12 Drinks in past year.

^jYoung adult (18-24 years) subsample only.

^kCollege students.

^lAge 50+ years.

^mNoncollege, Age 18-25 years.

ⁿAdolescent and young adult drinkers (12-21yrs) only.

^oAuthors created a combined measure of interpersonal and legal problems criteria.

^pTolerance severity not reported.