Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;30(3):321–336. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12843

TABLE 3.

Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool scores

Study author and year Preliminaries Introduction Design Sampling Data collection Ethical matters Results Discussion Total score and %

McAllister, Dunkley and Wilson 39

2008

2 2 4 3 3 2 3 3

22/40

55%

Dunkley, Pattie, Wilson and McAllister 41

2010

3 5 3 2 3 4 4 4

30/40

70%

Hill and Miller 13

2012

5 5 3 3 4 4 5 4

33/40

83%

Tucker 40

2012

4 5 4 4 3 2 4 4

30/40

75%

Tucker 42

2012

4 5 5 3 5 2 4 5

34/40

85%

Hines, Ramsden, Martinovich and Fairweather 37

2015

4 4 2 3 4 3 3 3

26/40

65%

Edirippulige et al 9

2016

4 5 3 3 3 3 3 2

26/40

65%

Ashburner, Vickerstaff, Beetge and Copley 35

2016

4 5 3 1 3 5 4 4

29/40

73%

Iacono et al 31

2016

3 5 3 2 2 2 3 4

24/40

60%

Akamoglu, Meadan, Pearson and Cummings 34

2018

4 5 3 4 4 4 4 3

31/40

78%

Campbell, Theodoros, Russell, Gillespie and Hartley 36

2019

5 5 3 4 3 4 5 4

33/40

83%

Johnsson, Kerslake and Crook 38

2019

3 3 3 3 2 4 3 3

21/40

53%

Rortvedt and Jacobs 33

2019

5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4

31/40

78%

Raatz, Ward and Marshall 32

2020

4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5

36/40

90%