Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28;27(4):369–386. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13733

TABLE 4.

Risk of bias of the studies that were included, assessed by the researchers

First author, (year) Ascertainment DM Ascertainment TB Same ascertainment method cases and controls Selection of cases/exposed Selection of controls Non‐response rate Representativeness exposed/cases Representativeness controls Handling incomplete outcome data
Kubjane et al. (2020) a [21]                  
Sinha et al. (2018) [25]                  
Lawson et al. (2017) [26]                  
Boillat‐Blanco et al. (2016) [22]                  
Senkoro et al. (2016) [23]                  
Bailey et al. (2016) [27]                  
Haraldsdottir et al. (2015) [24]                  
Bates et al. (2012) [28]                  
Faurholt‐Jepsen et al. (2011) [20]                  

Green: low risk of bias, orange: medium risk of bias or unclear, red: high risk of bias.

a

This study was a cohort study with a follow‐up rate of 75% after 3 months of follow‐up.