Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;77(7):2090–2103. doi: 10.1111/all.15206

TABLE 2.

Diagnostic accuracy of various serological immunoassays for the presence of previous COVID‐19. Results of a diagnostic accuracy study are shown

Analytical technique ELISA ELISA ELISA ECLIA CLIA CLIA LFI
Epitope Anti‐RBD Anti‐S1 Anti‐N Anti‐N Anti‐N Anti‐S1/S2 Anti‐RBD+
Antibody subtype IgG IgG IgG Pan‐Ig IgG IgG Pan‐Ig
Manufacturer In‐house Euroimmun Epitope diagnostics Roche diagnostics Abbott DiaSorin Bühlmann
Numbers of patients 3637 3658 3654 3630 3630 3630 2589
True positives 152 168 126 164 153 160 110
False negatives 40 27 66 25 36 29 21
False positives 98 62 79 54 60 84 95
True negatives 3347 3401 3383 3387 3381 3357 2363
AUC (95% CI) 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) 0.90 (0.86, 0.93) 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) 0.95 (0.93, 0.98) 0.95 (0.92, 0.97) 0.92 (0.88, 0.95)
Sensitivity (percent; 95%CI) 79.2 (72.7, 84.7) 86.2 (80.5, 90.7) 65.6 (58.4, 72.3) 86.8 (81.1, 91.3) 81.0 (74.6, 86.3) 84.7 (78.7, 89.5) 84.0 (76.6, 89.8)
Specificity (percent; 95%CI) 97.2 (96.5, 97.7) 98.2 (97.7, 98.6) 97.7 (97.2, 98.2) 98.4 (98.0, 98.8) 98.3 (97.8, 98.7) 97.6 (97.0, 98.1) 96.1 (95.3, 96.9)
Positive likelihood ratio 28 48 29 55 46 35 22
Negative likelihood ratio 0.21 0.41 0.35 0.13 0.19 0.16 0.17

Consecutive inpatients and medical personnel with suspected COVID‐19 were included in a prospective cross‐sectional study in a real‐life clinical setting (= 3658). A positive RT‐PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab was defined as the primary reference standard test representing a “previous SARS‐CoV‐2” infection (COVID‐19). Abbreviations: ELISA, enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay; ECLIA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay; CLIA, chemiluminescence immunoassay; LFI, lateral flow immunoassay; N, nucleoprotein; RBD, receptor‐binding domain of the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike glycoprotein; S1/2, domain 1 or 2 of the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike glycoprotein; RBD+, extended receptor‐binding domain of the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike glycoprotein.