Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;77(7):2090–2103. doi: 10.1111/all.15206

TABLE 4.

Diagnostic accuracy of an anti‐S1 ELISA (IgG) for the presence of previous COVID‐19 in various subgroups. Results of a diagnostic accuracy study are given (n = 3637)

Subgroup Numbers of patients True positives False negatives False positives True negatives Sensitivity Specificity
No. No. No. No. No. Percent (95%CI) Percent (95% CI)
Patient population
Full study cohort 3658 168 27 62 3401 86.2 (80.5, 90.7) 98.2 (97.7, 98.6)
Inpatients 1085 80 14 15 976 85.1 (76.3, 91.6) 98.5 (97.5, 99.2)
Outpatients b 2573 88 13 47 2438 87.1 (79.0, 93.0) 98.1 (97.5, 98.6)
Gender
Male 1147 81 6 18 1042 93.1 (85.6, 97.4) 98.3 (97.3, 99.0)
Female 2478 87 21 43 2348 80.6 (71.8, 87.5) 98.2 (97.6, 98.7)
Age
<50 years 2201 89 17 42 2070 84.0 (75.6, 90.4) 98.0 (97.3, 98.6)
>50 years 1457 79 10 20 1348 88.8 (80.3, 94.5) 98.5 (97.8, 99.1)
Symptoms
Any symptom 1985 143 25 39 1751 85.1 (78.8, 90.1) 97.8 (97.0, 98.5)
No symptoms 2473 88 13 47 2425 87.1 (79.0, 93.0) 98.1 (97.5, 98.6)
Days since PCR
≥28 3116 96 14 55 2951 87.3 (79.6, 92.9) 98.2 (97.6, 98.6)
≥21 3205 107 15 56 3027 87.7 (80.5, 93.0) 98.2 (97.7, 98.6)
≥14 3304 128 15 57 3104 89.5 (83.3, 94.0) 98.2 (97.7, 98.6)
a

Health‐care workers.