Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 14;2022:2256690. doi: 10.1155/2022/2256690

Table 3.

Comparison of indicators in the use of rhTPO for treatment of grade II, III, and IV thrombocytopenia [n, (%)].

Indicators Use of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) χ 2 value P Value
Grade II (n = 100) Grade III (n = 94) Grade IV (n = 39)
Delay of the next chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy cycle due to platelet decline
 No 56 (56.0) 40 (42.6) 14 (35.9) 5.921 0.052
 Yes 44 (44.0) 54 (57.4) 25 (64.1)
Regimen change due to altered platelet count
 No 85 (85.0) 88 (93.6) 32 (82.1) 4.962 0.084
 Yes 15 (15.0) 6 (6.4) 7 (17.9)
Dose reduction of chemoradiotherapy due to platelet decline
 No 85 (85.0) 81 (86.2) 31 (79.5) 0.970 0.616
 Yes 15 (15.0) 13 (13.8) 8 (20.5)
Days of treatment 5.00 (3.00, 6.00) 6.00 (4.00, 8.00) 6.00 (4.00, 11.00) 16.319 <0.001
Time to increase platelets (days) 3.00 (2.00, 5.00) 5.50 (3.00, 8.00) 6.00 (3.00, 11.00) 31.828 <0.001
Delay of the next chemoradiotherapy cycle (days) 0 (0, 5.75)> 3.00 (0, 9.25) 3.00 (0, 8.00) 8.460 0.015
Prolonged hospitalization due to platelet decline (days) 1.00 (0, 6.00) 3.50 (0, 7.00) 5.00 (0, 8.00) 7.908 0.019
Increased hospitalization costs due to platelet decline 5040.00 (3024.00, 6979.00) 6503.00 (5040.00, 9474.00) 7440.00 (5874.00, 14410.00) 35.347 <0.001
Platelet transfusion
 No 95 (95.0) 67 (71.3) 16 (41.0) 47.616 <0.001
 Yes 5 (5.0) 27 (28.7) 23 (59.0)