Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 14;2022:6422861. doi: 10.1155/2022/6422861

Table 2.

Review of published antimicrobial susceptibility results for Myroides spp.

Myroides spp. # Of isolates #S % S Citation
Amikacin 161 1 <1 4–7, 9, 10, 17, 21–34, 36, 40, 41, this report
Amoxicillin or ampicillin 83 28 33.7 13, 17, 28, 32, 35, 36, 41
Amoxicillin/clavulanate 13 4 30.8 4, 10, 13, 28, 32, 36
Aztreonam 156 1 <1 4–6, 10, 13, 17, 21, 22, 25, 26, 28, 30–33, 35, 36, 40, 41, this report
Cefepime 129 1 <1 4–7, 10, 13, 17, 21–23, 25, 26, 28, 30–36, 41, this report
Cefoperazone 43 0 0.0 40, 41
Cefoperazone/sulbactam 14 1 7.1 5, 36, 41
Cefotaxime 13 0 0.0 10, 13, 28, 30, 32, 33
Cefoxitin 10 0 0.0 13, 28, 32
Ceftazidime 159 0 0.0 4–7, 9, 10, 13, 17, 21, 22, 25, 28, 30–36, 38, 40, 41, this report
Ceftazidime/avibactam 2 0 0.0 24, this report
Ceftolozane/tazobactam 1 0 0.0 this report
Ceftriaxone 62 0 0.0 5, 7, 10, 22, 23, 26, 33, 40, 41, this report
Cefuroxime 4 0 0.0 10, 13, 32
Chloramphenicol 21 1 4.8 10, 20, 28, 41
Ciprofloxacin 163 13 8.0 4–7, 9, 10, 17, 20–23, 25–31, 33–36, 38–41, this report
Colistin 91 0 0.0 17, 21, 25, 28, 31, 32, 36, 41
Ertapenem 4 0 0.0 38, this report
Fosfomycin 60 0 0.0 17, 24
Gentamicin 161 0 0.0 4–7, 9, 10, 17, 21–34, 36, 40, 41, this report
Imipenem 158 3 1.9 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 17, 21–26, 28, 30, 31, 33–36, 38–41
Levofloxacin 102 20 19.6 4, 5, 9, 10, 17, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27, 30, 32, 33, 35, 36, this report
Meropenem 122 32 26.2 4–8, 11, 13, 17, 22, 24–26, 29–34, 36–38, 41, this report
Meropenem/vaborbactam 1 0 0.0 this report
Minocycline 19 19 100.0 31, 41, this report
Moxifloxacin 61 56 91.8 10, 17, this report
Piperacillin/tazobactam 124 17 13.7 4–7, 9, 10, 13, 17, 21–26, 29–33, 35, 36, 41, this report
Tetracycline 41 0 0.0 10, 26, 28, 33, 40
Tigecycline 69 54 78.3 17, 28, 32, this report
Tobramycin 58 1 1.7 4–6, 9, 21, 23, 24, 26–33, 40, this report
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 155 50 32.3 4–7, 9, 10, 17, 21–24, 28–33, 35, 36, 38, 40, 41, this report

When MICs were available, CLSI breakpoints for Enterobacterales were used for susceptibility interpretation. The cases in this report were considered 3 distinct isolates.