TABLE 2.
Target | Drug candidate (mechanism of action) | Title, aim, NCT number | Study design, endpoints (1. = primary outcome, 2. = secondary outcome measures) | Study arms N, age (years) | Current status (outcome) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMDA receptor | Ketamine (antagonist) |
Action of ketamine in treatment‐resistant depression |
Randomized, double‐blind, crossover assignment, 2‐step study 1. Change in MADRS score, BDNF gene VAL/MET polymorphism 2. Plasma and salivary concentrations of cortisol, melatonin and inflammatory mediators; CGI‐S, and self‐reported depression, and suicidality in comparison with midazolam |
2 arms in 2 steps Step 1: Single i.v. 0.5 mg·kg−1 bolus infusion ketamine or 1 mg·kg−1 midazolam over 40 min Step 2: 6 ketamine or midazolam infusions N = 46, age: 18–65 |
Completed (2013–2017): Cumulative and sustained antidepressant effects |
Evaluation of schemes of administration of intravenous ketamine in depression |
R andomized, initially double‐blind then open‐label, placebo‐controlled, parallel assignment study 1. Changes of HAM‐D and MADRS scores, brain glutamate and GABA concentrations (up to 12 weeks) |
2 arms: Ketamine i.v. 0.5 mg·kg−1 over 40 min, twice weekly for 8 weeks or placebo (saline) N = 30, age: 18–65 |
Recruiting (2018–2020) | ||
Ketamine for treatment‐resistant late‐life depression |
Randomized, quadruple‐blind, parallel assignment study 1. MADRS score (4‐week follow‐up) 2. Clinician‐administered dissociative state scale, cognitive test batteries, dementia screening test, general side effect rating scale, BDNF, resting‐state EEG, blood inflammatory biomarkers |
4 arms: Single i.v. 0, 1, 0.25, 0.5 mg·kg−1 bolus infusion ketamine or 1, 0.03 mg·kg−1 midazolam over 40 min N = 46, age: >55 |
Active, not recruiting (2015–) | ||
AXS‐05 (dextromethorphan + bupropion) |
A study to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS‐05 in subjects with treatment‐resistant major depressive disorder |
Randomized, active‐controlled, double‐blind study 1. Changes of MADRS score 2. Clinical Global Impressions‐Severity, HAM‐D |
2 arms: Oral test compound or bupropion (6 weeks) N = 312, age: 18–65 |
Completed (2016–2020): Results are not published | |
Open‐label safety study of AXS‐05 in subjects with depression |
Open‐label, multicentre, long‐term, single group assignment study 1. Safety (types and rates of adverse events) 2. Change in MADRS score |
2 arms: Oral test compound (2 times a day) for up to 12 months N = 300, age: 18–65 |
Recruiting (2019–, estimated completion 2020) | ||
Opioid receptors | Buprenorphine (partial μ receptor agonist + κ opioid receptor antagonist) |
Buprenorphine for TRD (BUP‐TRD) |
Randomized, triple‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel design study 1. Changes in MADRS score, BP, side effect rating scale, heart rate, weight 2. Brief Symptom Inventory—Anxiety Scale, Positive/Negative Affect Scale |
2 arms: Buprenorphine (0.2–1.6 mg sublingual; 8 weeks) or placebo N = 13, age: >21 |
Completed (2011–2018): Results are not published |
Combination approaches | Antidepressant + lamotrigine |
Efficacy and safety of antidepressant augmentation with lamotrigine |
Randomized, triple‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel add‐on assignment pilot study 1. MADRS score changes 2. CGI score |
2 arms: Oral 200 mg·day−1 lamotrigine or placebo added to the ongoing antidepressant (8 weeks) N = 34, age: 18–60 |
Completed (2004–2006): No differences compared with placebo; side effects: dyspepsia, nausea, rashes |
Antidepressant + olanzapine |
The study of olanzapine plus fluoxetine in combination for treatment of TRD |
Randomized, double‐blind, active compound‐controlled, parallel assignment study 1. MADRS score changes 2. Side effects, laboratory parameters, HAM‐A, HAM‐D, CGI and BCRS scores |
3 arms: Olanzapine + fluoxetine or olanzapine or fluoxetine (8 weeks) N = 605, age: 18–65 |
Completed (2002–2006): Significantly greater antidepressant effect of the combination | |
Olanzapine augmentation therapy in treatment‐resistant depression: A double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial |
Randomized, quadruple‐blind, placebo‐controlled add‐on parallel assignment study, 2 steps 1. HAM‐D score changes 2. MADRS, HAM‐D subscales, CGI |
2 arms: Oral 10 mg·day−1 olanzapine or placebo added to the ongoing antidepressant (2‐week treatment, responder selection, further 2‐month treatment, 2‐week follow‐up) N = 60, age: 18–65 |
Terminated (2006–2016) | ||
Antidepressant + risperidone |
Risperidone vs. bupropion ER augmentation of SSRIs in TRD |
Randomized, open‐label, comparative crossover, add‐on assignment study 1. MADRS score changes 2. HAM‐D. BDI, HAM‐A, CGI scores |
2 arms: Oral risperidone or bupropion ER added to the ongoing SSRI (6 weeks) N = 30, age: >18 |
Completed (2005–2015): Results are not published | |
A study of the effectiveness and safety of risperidone to augment SSRI therapy in patients with TRD |
Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel add‐on assignment study 1. MADRS score changes 2. HAM‐D and CGI scores |
2 arms: Oral risperidone (0.25, 0.5, 0, 2 mg·day−1) or placebo (30 weeks) added to citalopram (20–40 mg, 36 weeks) N = 258, age: 18–85 |
Completed (2002–2004): Results are not published | ||
Antidepressant + simvastatin |
Simvastatin as an augmentation treatment for treatment‐resistant depression: Randomized controlled trial |
Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled add‐on parallel assignment study 1. MADRS score changes |
2 arms: Oral 20 mg·day−1 simvastatin or placebo added to the ongoing antidepressant (3 months) N = 150, age: 18–75 |
Recruiting (2019–) | |
Antidepressant + minocycline |
Minocycline as adjunctive treatment for treatment‐resistant depression |
Randomized, quadruple‐blind, placebo‐controlled add‐on parallel assignment study 1. HAM‐D score changes 2. CGI, quality of life scale, GAD‐7 |
2 arms: Oral 100–200 mg·day−1 minocycline or placebo added to the ongoing antidepressant (6 weeks) N = 100, age: 18–80 |
Recruiting (2020–2021): Interim report‐minocycline is well tolerated and effective in reducing depressive symptoms | |
Antidepressant + aripiprazole |
Aripiprazole augmentation therapy in treatment‐resistant depression |
Open‐label pilot study 1. HAM‐D score changes 2. HAM‐D, MADRS, CGI, BDI |
Single arm: Oral 10 mg·day−1 aripiprazole to concurrent antidepressant (pre–post comparison, 3 weeks) N = 20, age: 18–70 |
Terminated (2006–2016) |
Note: Inclusion criteria: Phase III studies available on https://clinicaltrials.gov or https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/, patients with treatment‐resistant (major) depression.
Abbreviations: BCRS, Brief Cognitive Rating Scale; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BDNF, brain‐derived neurotrophic factor; CGI, Clinical Global Impression; CGI‐S, CGI‐Severity; GAD‐7, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7‐item scale; HAM‐A, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; HAM‐D, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; VAL/MET, valine/methionine.