Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;37(5):847–854. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15782

Table 1.

Comparison of the median values from three exams based on the disease type: (a) all patients, (b) patients with endoscopic remission, (c) histological remission, and (d) complete mucosal healing

Pancolitis Left‐sided Proctitis P‐value
(a) All patients n = 70 n = 27 n = 17
PGE‐MUM (μg/g·Cr) 15.7 15.0 (26) 15.1 0.911
FC (mg/kg) 54.3 (67) 29.9 8.7 (15) 0.002
FIT (ng/mL) 0 (68) 0 0 (16) 0.079
(b) ER n = 35 n = 11 n = 13
PGE‐MUM (μg/g·Cr) 13.7 14.8 14.5 (12) 0.738
FC (mg/kg) 37.5 (34) 20.0 8.4 (12) 0.014
FIT (ng/mL) 0 0 0 0.406
(c) HR n = 34 n = 16 n = 15
PGE‐MUM (μg/g·Cr) 14.2 13.1 (14) 15.1 0.728
FC (mg/kg) 34.1 16.9 8.0 (13) 0.038
FIT (ng/mL) 0 0 0 (14) 0.821
(d) CMH n = 28 n = 9 n = 13
PGE‐MUM (μg/g·Cr) 13.9 (27) 14.8 (7) 14.5 (12) 0.814
FC (mg/kg) 37.5 20.0 8.4 (12) 0.021
FIT (ng/mL) 0 0 0 0.793

Kruskal–Wallis test.

The number of analyzed samples is shown in parentheses if it differs from the total number of each disease type in (a)–(d). Very few patients with right‐sided colitis were excluded from this analysis.

CMH, complete mucosal healing; ER, endoscopic remission; FC, fecal calprotectin; FIT, fecal immunochemical test; HR, histological remission; PGE‐MUM, prostaglandin E‐major urinary metabolite.