Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 9;29(4):1187–1197. doi: 10.1111/ene.15238

TABLE 2.

Change in anti‐acetylcholine receptor antibody concentration (multivariable logistic regression)

Obs Event, n (%) n OR 95% CI p value
Model 1 a
Change in anti‐AChR‐ab concentration
Decrease ≥50% 53 46 (87) 4.39 1.79–10.74 0.001
Decrease 0%–50% 158 96 (61) Reference Reference Reference
Increase 84 29 (35) 0.31 0.17–0.57 <0.001
Continuous (per 10% decrease) 295 171 (58) 90 1.21 1.12–1.31 <0.001
Model 2 b
Change in anti‐AChR‐ab concentration
Decrease ≥50% 53 46 (87) 4.11 1.67–10.15 0.002
Decrease 0%–50% 158 96 (61) Reference Reference Reference
Increase 84 29 (35) 0.32 0.18–0.58 <0.001
Continuous (per 10% decrease) 295 171 (58) 90 1.21 1.12–1.30 <0.001
Model 3 c
Change in anti‐AChR‐ab concentration
Decrease ≥50% 47 41 (87) 3.65 1.40–9.54 0.008
Decrease 0%–50% 143 88 (62) Reference Reference Reference
Increase 77 27 (35) 0.31 0.17–0.57 <0.001
Continuous (per 10% decrease) 267 156 (58) 82 d 1.19 1.10–1.29 <0.001

Event was defined as improvement in MGFA score.

Abbreviations: AChR‐ab, anti‐acetylcholine receptor; MGFA, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America; n, number of individuals; Obs, number of observations.

a

Additionally adjusted for time since baseline measurement (months; continuous).

b

Model 1 additionally adjusted for age (years), and sex (male/female).

c

Model 2 additionally adjusted for use of immunosuppressive medication (yes/no), thymectomy (yes/no), and time since thymectomy (days (centered), continuous).

d

Lower number of patients due to missing values for immunosuppressive medication use, and/or (time since) thymectomy.