Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;55(4):290–311. doi: 10.1111/iej.13690

TABLE 7.

Pulpotomy success rates ≥12 months

Author Number receiving intervention Observation period (months) Number available at follow‐up Failures % (n) Calculated % success (n) Mature success % (n) Immature success % (n)
Caprioglio et al. (2014) 27 24–42 27 0 85.1 (23) a 0 (0) 85.1 (23)
Cvek (1993) 209 36 178 5 (9) 95 (169) 93.75 (90) 96.70 (88)
Fuks et al. (1982) 38 12–36 33 7.9 (3) 90.9 (30) 0 (0) 90.9 (30)
Klein et al. (1985) 34 13–36 14 14.29% (2) 85.7% Unknown Unknown
Xu (2016) 70 12 12 b 25% (3) 75% (9) Unknown Unknown
Fuks et al. (1993) c 63 13–50 39 10.25 (4) 89.74 (35) NA NA
Rao et al. (2020) 255 12–24 205 4 (8) 96 (197) 97.4 (75) 95.3 (122)

Combined healed and healing results as criteria for healing falls under successful criteria for this systematic review.

Only cases which were included in specified time to treat time period of <12 h were included.

Data taken from earlier study in series Fuks et al. (1987).