Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 3;8(7):e09862. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09862

Table 2.

Data arising from the samples analysis of the most potential locations regarding the struvite formation within the operational system of Budds Farm WWTP. The locations that present the symbol ∗ or ∗∗ indicate locations with the same sludge characteristics due to operational design. In addition, the brackets indicate the dilution of wastewater samples: double-distilled deionised water in order to reach the detection limits.

Hot-spots of struvite precipitation pH T (oC) PO43−(mg/L) NH4+ (mg/L) Mg2+ (mg/L)
Screened sludge storage tank 6.5 20.8 100 (1:4) 400 390
Thickened sludge storage tank∗ 5.4 20.8 100 (1:4) 100 390
SAS storage tank 7.2 21.1 100 10 350
Blended cake 6.4 22.0 100 100 190
Digester feed∗ 5.9 20.8 100 100 390
Digester recirculation pump 8.4 21.2 40 100 150
PDST (digested sludge) ∗∗ 8.4 20.8 200 (1:4) 200 (1:4) 190
Centrifuge feed∗∗ 8.4 20.8 200 200 190
SAS filtrate 7.1 20.3 100 (1:4) 10 380 (1:4)
Primary thickening filtrate 5.6 20.7 200 (1:4) 50 340
Centrate 8.1 21.5 40 200 (1:4) 230
SAS after thickened 7.0 20.5 100 10 260